this post was submitted on 28 Feb 2025
260 points (99.2% liked)

Technology

63547 readers
2884 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 day ago (4 children)

I'm afraid Europol is shooting themselves in the foot here.

What should be done is better ways to mark and identify AI-generated content, not a carpet ban and criminalization.

Let whoever happens to crave CSAM (remember: sexuality, however perverted or terrible it is, is not a choice) use the most harmless outlet - otherwise, they may just turn to the real materials, and as continuous investigations suggest, there's no shortage of supply or demand on that front. If everything is illegal, and some of that is needed anyway, it's easier to escalate, and that's dangerous.

As sickening as it may sound to us, these people often need something, or else things are quickly gonna go downhill. Give them their drawings.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

What would stop someone from creating a tool that tagged real images as AI generated?

Have at it with drawings that are easily distinguished, but if anything is photorealistic I feel like it needs to be treated as real.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Some form of digital signatures for allowed services?

Sure, it will limit the choice of where to legally generate content, but it should work.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

I highly doubt any commercially available service is going to get in on officially generating photorealistic CSAM.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 hours ago

Open-source models exist and can be forked

[–] [email protected] 3 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

This relies on the idea that "outlet" is not harmful. It might be encouraging even but who do you think even would ever study this to help us know here. Can you imagine the scientists who'd have to be leading studies like this - incredibly grim and difficult subject with high likelihood that no one would listen to you anyway.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 16 hours ago

IIRC there was actually a study and pedos with access to synthetic CSAM were less likely to victimize real children.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You can download the models and compile them yourself, that will be as effective as the US government was at banning encryption.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 16 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (1 children)

I hope they don't have access to a cloud computing provider somewhere, otherwise this is going to be a tough thing to enforce without a great firewall larger than China has.

It will be hilarious to see them attempt it though.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 15 hours ago

Sadly it seems like most of Europe and potentially other "western" countries will follow