this post was submitted on 01 Mar 2025
360 points (96.4% liked)

Technology

69156 readers
3688 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmit.online/post/5292633

This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/science by /u/calliope_kekule on 2025-03-01 05:53:17+00:00.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Oh so I don‘t have to worry about China‘s increasing emissions output because they use unhinged mass surveillance and terror against the people to put a band-aid on it. Cool…

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Doesn't China emit like half the amount of carbon per capita compared to the US?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

China has a very large capita.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

It's not that there should be a solution per se, more that it impacts their emissions per capita. When person density goes up average per person emissions go down, simple as.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

China already "solved" it with the one child policy. They will have the most massive population decline ever in the coming decades. It will probably destroy their economy.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago

One issue with that is China is still a heavily bike and moped driven country. The issue is when more of their population is able to afford cars. So they could still "catch up".

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I would be happy for sensors at traffic lights that detect whether cars are there or not. I don't consider that to be meaningful surveillance.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

But they already have sensors. That‘s not what China differentiates from the rest here.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Did you read the article? Standard traffic cameras or sensors are all you need to implement this. And yes, most places have the technology already in place to do most of it. You just need to add the part to network them and control the lights.