this post was submitted on 06 Mar 2025
17 points (94.7% liked)
English usage and grammar
399 readers
1 users here now
A community to discuss and ask questions about English usage and grammar.
If your post refers to a specific English variant, please indicate it within square brackets (for instance [Canadian]
).
Online resources:
- Cambridge English Dictionary
- Merriam-Webster Dictionary and Thesaurus
- Gilman's Webster's Dictionary of English Usage. This is a great and witty reference about usage, its history, and its controveries
Sibling communities:
Rules of conduct:
The usual ones on Lemmy and Mastodon.. In short: be kind or at least respectful, no offensive language, no harassment, no spam.
(Icon: entry "English" in the Oxford English Dictionary, 1933. Banner: page from Chaucer's "The Wife of Bath's Tale".)
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
This reminds me of the pushback I give when people try to standardize on “fora” and “octopi.”
Although these were the plural of “forum” and “octopus” in Latin and Greek, now that they’re english, the common pluralization of adding -s/-es is more appropriate in nearly every usage: forums and octopuses.
Using Latin and Greek pluralization at this point is weird.
Octopuses is way cuter.
Adorable octopode is adorable
You could argue all you want about it being a common pluralization. But the fact is that it doesn't matter, language users have no responsibility to use logic or make sense. You say something, if people understood it, then that's the way it is. Everything else is prescriptivism's anal fixations. The fucked up discrepancy between written and spoken French is their fault. The madness of English spelling is their fault. Bunch of stuck up academics who had the power to force others in the education system to follow their logic. Now a bunch of shit doesn't make sense. Because common people will talk however the fuck they want as long as they make themselves clear and you can't do anything about it.
I’m all for standards, but they’re for very specific contexts. And something can either meet the spec or not. It’s okay to point that out. That doesn’t mean it is right or wrong.
Even language that hasn’t been formally standardized can be out of spec. Just try using very formal language when texting in the middle of a relaxed chat.