this post was submitted on 17 Mar 2025
32 points (83.3% liked)

UK Politics

3518 readers
87 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both [email protected] and [email protected] .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

[email protected] appears to have vanished! We can still see cached content from this link, but goodbye I guess! :'(

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I reckon it’s time to call it. The threat to freeze personal independence payment (Pip) disability benefits shows that the fears voiced in the run-up to the general election were well founded. Keir Starmer’s government, cratering in the polls, with Reform snapping at its heels, is in serious trouble. Weekend reports suggested the latest cuts are being reconsidered after a backlash from Labour’s own MPs, charities and campaigners. It’s all vintage Labour, swinging between collected callousness and then flustered chaos.

Prior to the election, sceptics were told to keep the faith. Focus on the prize of getting the Tories out. It’s all three-dimensional chess, to whisper to rightwing voters. Starmer’s caution and inconsistency is only pragmatism, which could turn to radicalism in office.

But you don’t hear that much any more. The radicalism not only has not transpired, but something else, something cold and stomach-sinking, has emerged: a government clear in its intent on making savings by targeting the most vulnerable in society – the sick, disabled people, mentally ill people. This isn’t simply a locking in of the austerity state Labour inherited, but an extension of it.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 days ago (2 children)

I see, thanks for the info. Apparently Diane Abbott has suggested Labour should introduce a wealth tax instead of tightening rules around PIP. But maybe it's unlikely that the government will do this.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago

It's unlikely Starmer will do anything Diane Abbott suggests.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

I can't see them introducing anything that would count as a wealth tax. Tory papers are to out to get them. And they care to much about voters/funders that read those papers. Current Labour just ain't gonna go that left wing. Honestly atm nor were they likely to win the election if they did.

And with FPTP I honestly cannot see any other party that stands a chance of winning doing so.

Its def worth writing to labour MPs complaining about the attack on the poor and disabled again. But we would need at least 100/25% of labour MPs to threaten the government over this. That will be hard but far from impossible. Its just some option less left then a outright wealth tax will be needed to sell it. Given the breakdown of parliment and the numbers of right of centre labour mps.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago (2 children)

I can’t see them introducing anything that would count as a wealth tax.

Especially because the modest tax rises in the last budget were greeted by universal screeching noises (and... don't seem to have really paid off).

I agree with the general sentiment you're all expressing, that Labour should bit the bullet and raise taxes. But the problem is, in doing that we actually are asking them to break a promise they made to the electorate.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 days ago

The screeching noises are from the press which is owned by those who would be affected most .

You will note the press said much less about Rachel backing away from an another promise with regard to clamping down on non-doms.

I would go so far as to say most serious economists are calling for a wealth tax in some form or another, to support a healthy a prosperous society.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 days ago

That screeching is less universal then the press would suggest.

A 0.1% drop after a 0.4% rise is the best actual data they have. So all the claims of collapsing economy are exaggerated predictions not facts. But gowd are the press trying to push it as fact.

The econ is on a prestige. But the cause was the huge borrowing and lack pf regulation on spending during covid. It has left the UK with huge wealth disparity added to an international loan market that is less trusting of UK finances. Meaning the cost of borrowing has risen compared to gdp. Making spending harder. Increased inflation would actually help the gov by making current debt cheaper but harm the poor.

But dispite the tory press. The increase in borrowing costs are directly related to tories time in power and increased borrowing.