this post was submitted on 17 Mar 2025
154 points (98.7% liked)

News

27362 readers
4703 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The Supreme Court has long held that “a pardon cannot stop” courts from punishing cases of civil contempt. And while the marshals have traditionally enforced civil contempt orders, the courts have the power to deputize others to step in if they refuse to do so.

This authority is recognized in an obscure provision of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, which govern proceedings in federal trial courts. Rule 4.1 specifies how certain types of “process” — the legal term for orders that command someone to appear in court — are to be served on the party to which they are directed. The rule begins in section (a) by instructing that, as a general matter, process “must be served by a United States marshal or deputy marshal or by a person specially appointed for that purpose.”

The next section, Rule 4.1(b), is entitled, “Enforcing Orders: Committing for Civil Contempt.” It sets some geographical limits for where “[a]n order committing a person for civil contempt of a decree or injunction” may be served based on the federal vs. state nature of the underlying lawsuit. But it does not say who may enforce such an order, and it never modifies the general rule that process may be served by a marshal, deputy marshal or person specially appointed for that purpose. Thus, by its plain terms, Rule 4.1 contemplates that the court may appoint individuals other than the marshals to enforce civil contempt orders.

Archived at https://web.archive.org/web/20250317014025/https://www.democracydocket.com/opinion/if-the-marshals-go-rogue-courts-have-other-ways-to-enforce-their-orders/

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] masterofn001 40 points 21 hours ago (3 children)

And when the courts go rogue they can deputize .. Anyone. Like Andrew Tate, or elon.

Monkey paw urges caution

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Fuck that. That monkey paw bullshit is how the courts were stacked in the first place... Because Democrats are too busy pretending to be the adults in the room to recognize the game has changed

We have to use the tools we're given, or we hand a self described King all power

Not to mention, if this was a tool MAGA had use of, they'd use it with or without precedent

[–] masterofn001 1 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

Being pragmatic and realistic is not all sunshine and lollipops. Sometimes it is. These days the sun hates us and the lollipops are 100%plastic.

You already have a king. You had one when his followers declared him god king emperor. It.wasn't defeatist to try to sway people against him by warning of what the inevitable outcomem of.his reelection. Was it? Warning is not complying

It is warning.

J
F
C

The tools are not within the scope of the rules of the game.

Relying on rules while the bad guys relied on the good guys adhering to decorum is why we are here.

The institutions are being destroyed, their function and.power coalesced.

Do not hope an abstract concept of laws and justice will bring salvation or that they are finished perverting every noble intent and.safety mechanism.

I don't know why you're arguing with me.

Seriously, read my comments.

Tell me what I am.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 hours ago

I don't think you're on the wrong side, I think you're advocating to hold back on using a tool that can be used, right now, to mitigate some of the most terrible shit that can be done to a group of people by a government

But even forgetting what's at stake... Do you think there are no checks on this power? Do you think it isn't used already? There was a case last year where a judge ordered a custom bat mobile or something, and was unhappy he hadn't received it yet. The local cops flew across state lines and seized one in front of the judge in line. The judge ended up balking at using this legal argument, but it was discussed, and the opinion was that the judge had no legal basis for it anyways. I don't remember the resolution, but the judge was in danger of losing his robes over it

There's petty tyrants everywhere... The police are generally enablers of it to start with. Judges are still beholden to oversight, aside from the supreme court apparently

And back to where we are... Things aren't just going to go back to normal in two or four years. We're over the cliff, they're disappearing people and throwing them into what legally classifies as torture with no due process. They're trampling over the courts and the constitution - there's no going back from that, only forward

This isn't the time to tiptoe carefully around. It's not time to come up with reasons to let them continue to act, even if there's problems to work out later

[–] [email protected] 23 points 18 hours ago

Marshals can also deputize, and they’ve already deputized Elon’s private security.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

Nah, that's nonsense. Trump controls umpteen kinds of law enforcement already anyway; he doesn't need to deputize anything.

Your comment is just fearmongering to discourage resistance against his tyranny.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 20 hours ago

Your comment is just fearmongering to discourage resistance against his tyranny.

A lot of that going around lately, including telling people that the way they plan on resisting is "doing it wrong."

[–] masterofn001 3 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (2 children)

No. Akshually, I keep having comments removed for urging resistance.

It isn't trump who would be deputizing.

When shit hits, though, it won't matter who is deputized.

It'll be us vs them.

But, like you said, they basically control LEO. From FBI to marshalls and on down to the already rogue constitutional sherrifs.

In the meantime, do you think certain judges having the ability to deputize literally anyone for civil matter won't also be weaponized?

Such as in cases of pardons, or the media, or congress, where the magats will likely lay ridiculous charges on anyone and then have the trump appointed maga judges annoint and send forth their crusaders.

Caution is warranted. There is danger in this power. And we know who will use it.

Edit: wanna complain about my assessment?

Do something to stop it. Stop them. Fucking do something. Anything.

The dems won't. The feds won't.

Only those who do will.

Fight back.

Courts and.laws mean.nothing now.

Understand that.
That is reality.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

The judges already have the power and legal precedent to do so. The trumplets have already demonstrated zero care about needing either of those things, so I’m really not seeing what you hope to achieve by not using one of the few legal avenues actual consequences could be enacted on the fascists is?

Whatever you let them do, they will. stop complying with fascism.

[–] masterofn001 -1 points 6 hours ago

The fuck you on?

You're arguing a point I didn't even make.

I'm not complying. I'm fucking warning. Know what to expect. Jfc . you really like to be mad at your allies.

Anyway. Good luck.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (1 children)

You aren't the voice of reason here. Caution is no longer warranted. If you intend to continue fear mongering, just stop talking. You have a defeatist mentality and we do not need it.

[–] masterofn001 0 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

It is a warning, an educated expectation to prepare for likely outcomes.

If you aren't prepared for likely futures you aren't preparing.

Seeing the possible uses and outcomes is not defeatist. It is awareness.

Warning: bridge out You may drown, crash, etc

Yep, Defeatist.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago

Not a warning, not educated. Just foolishness. The other user already told you about deputizing and how you are wrong. You have the same mentality as the current Democrats in office - do not use the avenues available to you in fear they will be used against us.

They are already being used against us.

We are already crashing.

You are advocating for weakness. Like that user said, stop complying with fascism and expecting a better outcome.

Yes, defeatist.