this post was submitted on 19 Mar 2025
205 points (99.0% liked)

Work Reform

11298 readers
415 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] qwestjest78 5 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Here is my question, why would they want to do that? Like I get that they want to maximize productivity, but if you keep pushing them, then eventually people quit. Don't they still need workers?

[–] Evotech@lemmy.world 13 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

The strategy so far has to just hire new ones. The job is so on the rails anyone can do it. The machine tells you where to go, which items to pick up etc

You obviously don't want people to quit, but they want to push them as hard as possible without making them quit

[–] Zetta@mander.xyz 6 points 3 days ago

As Evotech said already, they churn through their tier 1 workers at a breakneck pace anyway. Pushing them harder won't make the issues worse, it's already bad. Plus they are continually striving to automate everything possible, so eventually many low level jobs at the warehouse will be automated

[–] wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 days ago

For warehouse positions, at least a decade ago, "hiring events" consisted of showing up with a valid driver's license. I think they did a background check. No interview. Boom, you've got a job.

They effectively have an infinite labor supply and have everything structured to be incredibly resistant to what little room there is for error.