this post was submitted on 19 Mar 2025
1769 points (99.7% liked)
Political Memes
7277 readers
3218 users here now
Welcome to politcal memes!
These are our rules:
Be civil
Jokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.
No misinformation
Don’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.
Posts should be memes
Random pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.
No bots, spam or self-promotion
Follow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I'm fairly convinced that what makes a lot of the US population right wing is a lack of understanding of what that means.
My dad (long time conservative but can't get on the trump train which is good at least) thinks that "tax the rich" means people like high end doctors and surgeons. People who are absolutely in the top 1% but like "has a nice weekend car and maybe a lake house" not people making millions of dollars per month or week (or more)
"The difference in wealth between a surgeon and a billionaire is about one billion dollars, it's the billionaires that need to pay more taxes, they pay a smaller % than you."
How the the story of the nurses who pay more tax than Bezos didn't result in a landslide for progressives, I'll never understand.
Propaganda is a helluva drug
including misinformation and disinformation from right wing sources.
Yes...that's what I said
More as a percentage* than nurses.
That's one of the arguments my dad makes too, depending on the source he pays like 1-2% in taxes on a given year which was over a billion dollars last year.
Which is hilarious. That percentage should be around 40-50% if not more.
And at one point it was pretty close to that in many parts of the West. For as much as American conservatives want to go back to the 50s socially, they don’t seem keen on bringing back the fiscal policies of the time…
And the people who want to go back to the 50s don't realise that the fiscal policies were what made that time great, not the social norms.
For example, the great thing wasn't that women had to do the housework, the great thing was that you only needed one worker per household to live a good life.
Your dad thinks that people earn money by working for it. In other words, he's what would be a normal person in a socialist society.
All you have to do now is teach him what capitalism is.
Yeah, it's hard for the human mind to comprehend how much money a billion dollars actually is and neither of the two major political parties in this country want to expand it to them
The top 1% make roughly $600k per year, or probably more significantly (as not all rich people get "income"), a net worth of $11million according to this article
So yeah, maybe some doctors are in that category, but it's probably just the real big earners.
mostly the actualy 0.5% to .05% which are the hundred millionaires and billionaires. MDs are close to 1%
Yes that's why I called them "people absolutely in the top 1%"
Natural result of the massive and constant effort to make the Republican party seem less insane than it is that's undertaken by both political parties for some reason
The medias are normalizing the pathological behaviours from the GOP. That false requirement to be unbiased in the face of the most serious breach to the constitution is what got us here.
Not all ideas are worth consideration and mainstream medias are failing to understand that.
"failing to understand that" oh they're aware, it's just they're all large companies with motivations to keep the far right in power.
True, but it’s not the secretive conspiratorial type of motivations, it’s the “make money; make numbers go up” motivations. Corporate news are owned by billionaires for a reason- naked power. Your rag might lose money but the spin they make can help everything else.
Honest, truthful reporting is, by nature, kind of boring to the average person. Hence all reporting has to be pumped up, juiced with outrage or horror or astounding details somehow. Making it inherently dishonest.
And there is no such thing as an objective point of view.
trump gets eyes on the tv, and that exposes them to more ad revenue. all these grifters are helping as well, including resistance grifters of the "left.
I don't think that helps, but public opinion of the media is pretty low and fewer people are reading the news all the time, so I don't think that explains it.
The real problem is that the average person who doesn't think about politics much and assumes the truth is somewhere to the left of what Republicans are saying and to the right of the Dems constantly hears Dems like Schumer Jeffries Pelosi Hoyer etc. talk about how we need to strengthen the border and fund the police and other stupid shit like that, and it ends up making things like the suspension of asylum rights and giving billions of dollars of taxpayer money to for profit organizations seem like a reasonable middle ground.
e; ... buuut, I also feel compelled to point out that the one place I was able to find a recording of this town hall was through a "news" channel that was actually founded by this lawmaker, so the media environment is not not a problem I suppose
Public opinion of the media going down is also driven by the right wing. Hell, I don't think the media minds it, given that most of those companies also have stakes in other shit that'll, at least in their minds, benefit from a corporatist government.
If you include social media algorithms as "news" the point still stands. TikTok, Facebook, Twitter all want right wing in power.
also propagandizing that there is an actual left or communist party in america too. usa is the most right wing WESTERN country out there. being puritanical around nudity is pretty telling too.
Right, for the most part the Democrats tend to fit the definition of conservative better than the Republicans. The Republicans themselves more or less covering the spectrum of right wing. Although you do occasionally get a character like Nixon who policy wise in a lot of ways meets the definition of liberal better than most of today's Democrats.
The ~~Civil rights activist~~ SJW cringe compilations were literal Russian propaganda to get malicious and stupid people to reject the civil rights movement.