this post was submitted on 18 Mar 2025
1932 points (99.5% liked)
Work Reform
11298 readers
54 users here now
A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.
Our Philosophies:
- All workers must be paid a living wage for their labor.
- Income inequality is the main cause of lower living standards.
- Workers must join together and fight back for what is rightfully theirs.
- We must not be divided and conquered. Workers gain the most when they focus on unifying issues.
Our Goals
- Higher wages for underpaid workers.
- Better worker representation, including but not limited to unions.
- Better and fewer working hours.
- Stimulating a massive wave of worker organizing in the United States and beyond.
- Organizing and supporting political causes and campaigns that put workers first.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Literally what have I said anywhere that suggests I'm in any way, "baffled?" I'm just pointing out how fucked up it is to others who don't understand, such as the person I replied to.
You keep asking basic civics questions as one would of they are baffled.
What's fucked up is you're appearantly just learning about it but are old enough to use the Internet unsupervised.
Basic civics questions that you can't answer because I know the answers to them and you don't, or you do and they prove that you're wrong so you evade them, since you're a troll.
Already did and provided sources and I might add you have a cacophony of people telling you you're wrong and that you should actually look into it instead of making what you think are pointed questions about a subject you clearly don't understand and appearantly can't be bothered to look into but you certainly have no issue getting obtuse about it.
You provide two links to random unrelated pages after having previously lied, claiming that sources had already been provided, entirely so that you could then repeat the lie and have something to point to, even though again, the links were irrelevant. Troll.
No one lied crybaby.
They aren't unrelated you're just removed or arguing in bad faith. I'm know my guess as to which.
You literally did lie. You claimed I had been "provided sources" at a time when not a single source had been provided anywhere. That's called lying.
I'm pretty sure someone else did, it's irrelevant because I provided links and you didn't bother to do any research you just discarded them by look alone. So again dumb or not arguing in good faith so you can drop the indignation as it's fairly stale.
No, they did not. You are lying when you say that, just like you were lying when you claimed it the first time.
Here's a link that proves every claim you made this whole conversation is wrong. It literally says on this page that, in this specific comment chain, nobody had provide a link to a source at the time you claimed they had. The link is: https://disneyworld.disney.go.com/
See, I can provide irrelevant links and lie about what they say just like you do.
Who cares?! You have them now and you're not bothering to use them because you don't care you'd rather just object to object.
I literally did use them and they didn't show anything you claimed they showed after I said they wouldn't and you doubled down that they did. I literally provided screenshots. Liar and troll.
I didn't at first, then I went back and did.
How do you think I got screenshots of the page without visiting the page, exactly? Please tell me, I'm fascinated to hear your explanation.
Yeah that's called inconsistency like I said.
The point isn't to screenshot it, it's too use the bar resources of the aflcio, nlrb and BLS websites which provide pretty literally any statistics you're curious about. Your laziness or inability to do research isn't my concern, I'm not your teacher so I'm just going to point you in the right direction and how you can figure it out on your own. You apparently can't or didn't and instead want everyone to do the leg work for you so all you have to do is find some increasingly idiotic reason to say "Nuh uh" and provide no counter evidence.
You could've used any of the resources you mentioned to accesses the relevant statistics. Your laziness or inability to do research isn't my concern, I'm not your teacher. You apparently can’t or didn’t want to find the information and instead want everyone to do the leg work for you so all you have to do is find some increasingly idiotic reason to say “Nuh uh” and provide no counter evidence.
You mean I could teach you how to do research but doing it for you. You won't learn if entering is just handed to you. Critical thinking and moderate motivation would a answer every question you've posed including your modified version you're claiming now.
As for the rest.
semper necessitas probandi incumbit ei qui agit
You take the negative you bear the burden of evidence.
Correct! I asked a question, you said no, therefore you bear the burden of evidence.
No you disagreed with the person a comment ahead then went on a tirade about people saying it's not "fucked up" which you can't evidence.