this post was submitted on 20 Mar 2025
294 points (98.7% liked)

politics

22105 readers
5307 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Rep. Harriet Hageman faced loud boos at a Wyoming town hall after endorsing funding for Elon Musk’s DOGE cost-cutting initiative.

The crowd, mostly opposed to her stance, jeered as she laughed and clapped, labeling the audience’s reaction "embarrassing."

Hageman defended Social Security funding despite concerns that Musk’s efficiency drive might cut it, calling it a “Ponzi scheme.”

The only bipartisan applause came when Hageman opposed closing rural mail distribution centers.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 81 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Somehow, she thought these were good talking points:

“I voted in favor of the continuing resolution, or CR, which extends funding…” Rep. Harriet Hageman said as the booing began. She smiled as she continued, “…for the fiscal year until September 30.”

“It keeps the lights on for President [Donald] Trump and DOGE to continue their work,” she added, as the booing reached a crescendo.

It's worth noting:

About 500 people had packed the civic center auditorium in Laramie, where a local reporter with the Cowboy State Daily estimated about three-quarters of the crowd were there to oppose her.

It was a “startling dynamic” in a state that Trump carried with more than 72 percent of the vote, according to the Cowboy State Daily.

The Luigi talk was interesting and suggests there is biparstisanship on the problem of the oligarchy:

During Wednesday’s town hall, the crowd also burst into chants of “Tax the rich!” and “January 6th!”

I'm also unsure why the crowd chanted "January 6th" given that the seditionists were pardoned and this is very red Wyoming. Could there be some bipartisanship here as well now?

These GOP townhalls are very enjoyable. Let's hope we see more of this.

[–] [email protected] 38 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The implication I'm getting from that January 6th chant is that they're basically threatening to lynch 'em. I grew up and am still surrounded by these ingrates, they are surprisingly murder happy towards politicians in general let alone the feds.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I grew up and am still surrounded by these ingrates

Found JD Vance's Lemmy account

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I meant the Trumpers in particular since they can be quite annoying. Also unlike Vance I'm not affiliated with wannabe weirdo pseudo philosophers.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Lol I know, I was just thinking of Vance's "have you even said 'thank you'?"

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

May I have some context? I have no clue what you're referencing or at least I don't remember.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I was referring to this: https://youtu.be/ayBRXIN9Kro

Specifically Vance around 3:38

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

Ah that. Didn't watch any of that due to how much the whole event makes my blood boil.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 day ago

These GOP townhalls are very enjoyable. Let's hope we see more of this.

Let's hope the energy leads to change. I do want to be entertained, but I want to safe first.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Maybe it was a "Let's Go Brandon" moment and they were chanting "January Siths?". Current administration does come across a bit...dark-side-y, to put it lightly...and the opposition isn't that great at branding.

Musk and Trump have sort of an emporer/Vader dynamic. Hopefully one will find their humanity and kill the other before promptly dieing themselves. A man can dream.