this post was submitted on 22 Mar 2025
2214 points (99.0% liked)

Microblog Memes

7127 readers
2461 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

The maga problem isn't just Trump. This is the culmination of decades of work by christo-fascist conservatives. They're not resting on their laurels and lining their pockets like a normal regressive administration. Every effort is being taken to solidify their power and deconstruct any threat that might rise up post-trump. Even if they did eat themselves there won't be a government to rebuild.

We're passing an inflection point in American politics. People want change and polls indicate they don't care what side it comes from. The Democratic party has never polled lower. Being the milquetoast neoliberal corporate party is objectively the worst anchor to tie around your neck.

AOC and Bernie's message isn't wildly popular on accident. That energy needs to be captured and amplified, Democratic party or not. What's the worst that happens from a split ticket? More people stay home?

Edit: you don't even have to run against them to capture the Democratic party. Just have headliner progressives threaten it with a broad show of support and you force them to open up the primaries. Their policies have no support, they have no chips to call the bluff.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

A Trump presidency, let alone TWO, wouldn't have been possible without the gradual dumbing down of Americans over the last century, which IMO is an unintended side effect of progressive addiction to entertainment and convenience. Nobody conspired to make people more stupid by getting them to watch too much TV. That happened as business people strove to sell more products and get richer, like always.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Conspiring to make and keep people stupid is a conservative top 10 hit. For them the ideal populace is homogenous, fertile, docile, fearful and uneducated.

Anti-intellectual attacks have been the go-to for centuries, they've just gotten more modern and efficient. Look into groups like the heritage foundation, prager u, the heartland institute and (most importantly) the people bankrolling them.

Its a long legacy of chipping away at the foundations of democracy and critical thinking. Blaming technology and the free market is buying their propaganda. It's the same lie they use to frame climate collapse as an unavoidable natural cycle.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

I know there are individuals who hate the world and want everybody else to be suffer, or to be dumb and gullible because then they're easier to con. But IMO the main driver is the basic conservative attitude that everybody should stand on their own two feet - either because in their minds it makes the nation stronger, or they just resent having to pay for anybody else's anything - even things that benefit other conservatives. Individually motivated group behavior often looks like a conspiracy but it's not. Most people don't eat meat to spite vegans, or floss to put dentists out of business. Etc.