this post was submitted on 22 Mar 2025
2235 points (99.0% liked)

Microblog Memes

7188 readers
4801 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

FPTP ensures that every vote in the winning party goes to the electoral college.

So if you vote 51% dem, and 49% republican, in a FPTP state 100% of all electoral votes are dem.

If you have a system like IRV where you split it between the electoral as fairly as possible, you lose literally half of your votes. And given that EVERY red state uses FPTP, aside from nebraska you're running a wildly uphill battle. You should be targeting red states first. And blue states last, otherwise we will almost certainly end up in a worse position, losing TONS of our voting potential.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Yeah, right. So almost like a prisoner's dilemma bind. And I guess a national change is fairly unlikely any time soon..

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

yeah, literally, you're fucked if you do, and you're fucked if you don't. The only situation in which you win here is starting in red states.

also, a federal change to the law is illegal afaik, so it would have to be something that either, states individually agree on unanimously, or something the federal government can't even control.