this post was submitted on 06 Apr 2025
802 points (99.1% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

6368 readers
982 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world. About 1C of total warming. Second chart: about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability. Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases. About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
802
Trump administration orders half of national forests open for logging (wapo.st)
submitted 4 days ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
155 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Access options:

Yes, this means a ton of carbon ends up in the atmosphere instead of in the trees. The right move would be thinning and prescribed burns, but this administration isn't going to do that.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 16 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I agree with everything you said... except the ableist slur. I have worked with special needs people and they can be some of the sweetest, most genuine, hardest-working people you'll meet! Please ditch the outdated term, we need to be better than that...

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I'd be interested to understand more about why you find this usage of the word "removed" offensive. I sometimes use the word as a synonym for "stupid" or "idiotic", but would never use the term to refer to a person with a developmental disability. I'm curious if your experience is different. Do you feel the word should be eliminated from usage entirely?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 19 hours ago

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sealioning

And just in case you're asking in good faith, I don't "find" it offensive, it's a slur. I can't go up to my white friend, call him the n-word and say "I use it for someone who doesn't use turn signals." Words have meaning based on how society uses them collectively, not your individual opinion.