this post was submitted on 08 Apr 2025
740 points (99.7% liked)

News

28601 readers
5953 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

The Trump administration fired Vice Adm. Shoshana Chatfield, the only woman on NATO’s military committee, reportedly due to past statements supporting diversity.

Chatfield, a decorated Navy pilot and Afghanistan veteran, appeared on a conservative “woke” watchlist targeting senior military officials who promoted DEI.

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, leading the anti-DEI campaign, made the call, though it's unclear if Trump directly ordered it.

Chatfield is the third top female officer dismissed under Trump. Critics warned the firings undermine military leadership and damage U.S. alliances.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 38 points 5 days ago (7 children)

Think we'll see a draft enacted to shore up the missing positions?

[–] [email protected] 37 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (2 children)

Funnily enough - as a transgender man, I am signed up for the Selective Service (they make you do it for FAFSA - get flagged if you put down male anywhere.) I’ve heard that I was supposed to get some sort of letter disqualifying me, but I just got the regular card. Guess I could be marching next to y’all in WW3.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 5 days ago

Nah, you'd be disqualified during intake. Silver lining I guess?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 days ago

If you're 26 or older, you're legally aged out of it (not that i think that means much at this point)

[–] [email protected] 32 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (3 children)

We haven’t had enough enlistment to fill our military needs in decades. We have as many hired contractors as enlisted. The contractors are majority non US citizens.

We’ve been avoiding a draft because it would cause major resistance to our unnecessary military activities that can currently be pushed to the back of most people’s minds.

https://www.csis.org/analysis/us-military-forces-fy-2021-space-sof-civilians-and-contractors

Operational contractors continue to play a vital role in CENTCOM, holding a 2.8 to 1 ratio of contractors to military (up from 1.7 to 1 last year) as military forces exit Iraq, Syria, and Afghanistan while contractors stay behind.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 days ago

Wow that link threw me for a second. I was trying to figure out what CSIS was doing with a .org website.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 days ago

Treated like shit for 4 years, paid a pittance, and left to rot after... I can only wonder why they're struggling to fill rank.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago

I heard they recently filled their quota for 2 branches recently, due to military propaganda like top gun Maverick. When before, due to COVID they lost a ton of recruits

[–] [email protected] 19 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (2 children)

The US military is not draft friendly. Far too much of our doctrine is built around "skilled" combat (e.g. maneuver warfare) and our superiority comes from technology which has a high cost per soldier (the NVGs that Scumbag Steve lost cost more than it would to rush him through boot camp...) and requires maintenance. And, if we move forward with the XM7, that means fewer bullets per soldier which means a greater need to actually aim (and be indoctrinated so that they will aim at the brown person rather than fire over their heads).

Obviously we can do a massive doctrine change. But "senior military" will gladly support efforts that remove competition so that they can get promoted into a woman's place. They won't support efforts that will make them look incompetent when (and it is "when"...) we actually use the military... or that will impact all those "totally friendly" gifts and vacations they get from the companies building this gear.

In the event of a land war against Canada? All bets are off and you can be damned sure there will be "patriotic" efforts for "new recruits" to buy their own AR-15s from Walmart before reporting to the trenches. But that will happen regardless of whether the pesky women and gays and brown people have been cleansed from the military first.


Everyone (rightfully) shat on how ill equipped the russian military was outside of their "elites". And... there is a reason for that. You don't give someone off the street optics that cost a down payment or two on their pickup truck. Partially because they will lose (or sell) it. Mostly because they won't know how to use it. WW2/Vietnam era boot camp was basically "This is a gun. Point this end at the . Pull the trigger a few times to keep their heads down while someone competent does the rest".

[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 days ago

Small point of correction there - Walmart doesn't sell AR-15s or any other similar semi-auto rifle, nor do they sell handguns. They pared back gun offerings in the last decade to only basic hunting stuff like shotguns, bolt-action rifles. They don't even sell handgun ammo or "assault rifle" ammo now.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (2 children)

The specialty of the US military has always been logistics AFAIK. They'll traditionally endlessly throw bodies and money at maintaining supply lines to uphold their own morale and wait for their enemy to surrender. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ice_cream_barge

Not sure how well that'll work in the face of modern warfare, drones and sabotage seem more effective.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago

So basically Russia is doing but with more tech and supplies.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago

drones and sabotage seem more effective

The drones need to be launched, and saboteurs deployed, near their targets. That means logistics.

Fucking up supply chains with brainless tariffs will massively damage logistics.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Maybe, I've seen a lot of recent increases in advertisements to join the military. If that crap starts up, that'll be what gets me to leave the country. There isnt a thing in the world that could get me to fight for these dipshits kn their misguided wars.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 days ago (1 children)

If they institute a draft you're not going to be allowed to leave the country.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 days ago

It'll be for vacation, obviously I'll be booking a return trip.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

When there is a war, HitlerPig will definitely have a draft, if for no other reason that he will think its amusing to watch people get pissed off about it. At his core, he is a Troll.

Nothing is more evil than a draft, when the government literally enslaves young men to be forced to kill or be kill.

And it will be young men, these Neanderthals will want the young girls to stay behind so the Sociopathic Oligarchs have the pick of the tenderonis without the competiton of young men. Skum has all the money in the world, and he still can't find a loving partner, even if he wants to buy one. The only way hes been able to have DNA Storage Units/ Human Shields, is by renting wombs. Maybe if we kill off all the young men under 30 years old, he can find a desperate young woman to be his concubine.

I will state this unequivocally: My son will NEVER take part in any MAGA war. At least, not on their side.

And if HitlerPig decides to skip the concept of a draft system, and resorts to the Russian style of draft, and have press gangs driving around in trucks, literally snatching men off the streets, and they get my son (or they ship him off to the new Guantanamo Concentration Camp), I will have nothing left to lose, and I will become a VERY dangerous man indeed.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 days ago

Likely they want to use the draft to "break men in".

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 days ago

Joke's on them, not only do I have my DD-214, I'm even more old and broken now!