this post was submitted on 17 Apr 2025
105 points (97.3% liked)

Political Discussion and Commentary

691 readers
5 users here now

A place to discuss politics and offer political commentary. Self posts are preferred, but links to current events and news are allowed. Opinion pieces are welcome on a case by case basis, and discussion of and disagreement about issues is encouraged!

The intent is for this community to be an area for open & respectful discussion on current political issues, news & events, and that means we all have a responsibility to be open, honest, and sincere. We place as much emphasis on good content as good behavior, but the latter is more important if we want to ensure this community remains healthy and vibrant.

Content Rules:

  1. Self posts preferred.
  2. Opinion pieces and editorials are allowed on a case by case basis.
  3. No spam or self promotion.
  4. Do not post grievances about other communities or their moderators.

Commentary Rules

  1. Don’t be a jerk or do anything to prevent honest discussion.
  2. Stay on topic.
  3. Don’t criticize the person, criticize the argument.
  4. Provide credible sources whenever possible.
  5. Report bad behavior, please don’t retaliate. Reciprocal bad behavior will reflect poorly on both parties.
  6. Seek rule enforcement clarification via private message, not in comment threads.
  7. Abide by Lemmy's terms of service (attacks on other users, privacy, discrimination, etc).

Please try to up/downvote based on contribution to discussion, not on whether you agree or disagree with the commenter.

Partnered Communities:

Politics

Science

founded 9 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 month ago (3 children)

We’re in a conundrum here:

  • The elections were rigged
  • The Constitution is a living document but ultimately didn’t take into account technology:
    • First Amendment didn’t anticipate the internet and how much quicker information flows. It also didn’t take into account that there could be financial and lethal repercussions.
    • Second Amendment didn’t anticipate weapons that only the government or wealthy could have. You might have a shotgun, but they have the ability to wipe out entire cities if push comes to.
  • People are in such dire straights living paycheck to paycheck with health insurance dependent on a job. Who wants to risk any of that when they have a family to support?
  • The Democrats who could have put a potential halt to this getting any worse are STILL thinking they can get changes after the Midterms

We’re stuck, nobody really knows what to do besides protest. Unfortunately, I think it’s going to come down to life and death decisions before there’s any hope of change.

Shitposting doesn’t solve anything but if it helps some people relieve a little stress 🤷🏻‍♂️

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

We’re stuck, nobody really knows what to do besides protest.

In addition to protests:

  1. Joining and organizing within your local community to create connections with others is incredibly powerful, and will lay the groundwork for effective resistance.
  2. We can effect things drastically with a general strike. This would massively impact their income streams, and can bring a fascist government to its knees if done on a large enough scale.
  3. Join the IWW and attempt to unionize your workplace, so that the general strike is even more effective (plus you'll get better pay and benefits!)

If we put in the work, we can resist this and we can win. Join up with allies while we still can easily!

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

The founders had privately owned warships with the most modern cannons available, and wrote the second amendment in the context of a government with no standing army that organized common defense via militia.

The idea that individuals could wield enough power to level cities was never anathema, merely assumed not to be an issue due to the financial limits on the size of mercenary companies in that age.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I don't think the last elections were rigged outside of propoganda but it does knock me over the elected officials who seem to be working toward the midterms when its pretty obvious to me the administrations plan is for midterms to not happen in any meaningful way. Either not happening or really rigged.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

They were rigged in all the same ways the Republicans have been trying to rig them for years. They intimidated voters, they closed polling locations, they purged voter rolls, etc. You don't have to fake the votes if you can stop them from being cast in the first place.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

Don't forget the gerrymandering and the gaming of the electoral college since the Dakota split (and before)

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (2 children)

The last elections were illegitimate because a felon cannot run for president, yet SCOTUS allowed that.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 month ago (1 children)

A felon can run for president, and it makes sense why the US allows it.

Someone who engaged in sedetion/insurrection is not allowed to hold office ... and THAT is where the US legal system's corruption failed us all.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago

That’s correct. I misspoke.

States did attempt to block him from the ballots, but our system failed to enforce it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

To clarify, I believe you mean that it is unconstitutional for someone who foments insurrection to be elected. THIS is what if was about, and THIS is what the Anderson decision ratfucked us into.

E: ah, just saw the other person saying this.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Trump verbally confirmed that they were, more than once.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Great now you believe everything he says

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

What does Trump gain by lying? Any of his lies can be traced back to him gaining something.

Do you honestly think that the party of, "every accusation is a confession," who spent 4 years screaming about election fraud didn't commit election fraud?

Are you trying to be a trump apologist and say he didn't really mean what he was saying?

[–] [email protected] -4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Either he's a liar or he's not, you can't have it both ways and complain about both LMAO 🤣

It's like the cake thing

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago

I didn’t even read this entire thread, but you guys are already fighting 😂. This is not how you build coalition.