this post was submitted on 19 Apr 2025
406 points (98.3% liked)

politics

23087 readers
4309 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
  • Trump’s approval has taken a substantial swing of 9.6 points, from a net positive of 6.2 points in late January to a net negative of 3.4 points in mid-April.
  • Trump’s loss in support among Hispanic and young adults has been especially steep.
  • The president has not persuaded Americans that foreign countries and producers will bear the burden of higher tariffs, or that the gain will be worth the pain.
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

They didn't. They didn't vote for the alternative because of one issue. That's the problem.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago (2 children)

The party would rather have trump than abandon their only issue.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I hope they're happy. That is all.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago

I'm sure they are. They got their second choice (well, third, but netanyahu can't run in the US), they're getting the policy they wanted, and they get to blame the left for all of it.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

People can't control the party, but they could impact the outcome and choose not to.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

People can’t control the party

Then it's not a party.

but they could impact the outcome and choose not to.

If they are significant enough to blame, they were significant enough to listen to.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Yes they were significant enough to listen to, but at some point people need to take accountability. You can only control what you do, not others.

If the party was unwilling to change, they still had a choice to make. They made that choice. They had the ability to impact the outcome and they didn't.

There is more than one issue to care about in the world. Not voting for one side because of a single issue, when the other side has dozens of issues, is accepting that you are ok with either outcome. So those who choose not to vote told the world that they didn't care either way, because they had a chance to impact the outcome and didn't.

You said "The party would rather have trump than abandon their only issue." The reality is, people would rather have Trump than vote against a single issue, and that's what happened. And that single issue is still an issue! It did nothing.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yes they were significant enough to listen to, but at some point people need to take accountability.

How many more fucking decades before they're listened to, then? Because it's starting to look like "fucking never and we hate you lol."

[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

Yes, they should listen, but it's two separate things. Regardless what the DNC does, each person has a choice, a chance cast a choice.

People had a choice, they could have impacted the outcome and choose not to. Those people, by not doing anything, were accepting that the worser outcome could happen, and they were ok with that. If they weren't, they would have taken action, within their power, to prevent it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Thank you for confirming that the party will never listen.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

They probably won't. But that isn't even the point, it's the deflection. People had an option to vote. They didn't. They are complicit.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Easy for you to say.

You have two parties that represent you.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

So just discredit my point of view by labeling me as the enemy. Sounds like you're in a cult sir.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 hours ago

What do you care? I will never have political representation.

Oh right. You want me shut up and pretend to be happy that you have two republican parties that represent you.