this post was submitted on 25 Apr 2025
755 points (95.1% liked)

Dank Memes

6892 readers
1111 users here now

This is the place to be on the interweb when Reddit irreversibly becomes a meme itself and implodes

If you are existing mods from r/dankmemes, you should be mod here too, kindly DM me on either platform

The many rules inherited from

  1. Be nice, don't be not nice
  2. No Bigotry or Bullying
  3. Don't be a dick!
  4. Censor any and all personal information from posts and comments
  5. No spam, outside links, or videos.
  6. No Metabaiting
  7. No brigading
  8. Keep it dank!
  9. Mark NSFW and spoilers appropriately
  10. NO REEEEEEE-POSTS!
  11. No shitposting
  12. Format your meme correctly. No posts where the title is the meme caption!
  13. No agenda posting!
  14. Don't be a critic
  15. Karma threshold? What's that?

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
755
Also a plumber (lemm.ee)
submitted 1 day ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
111 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -1 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

It's exceedingly common for a question about one narrow thing to be an indicator of desire for knowledge about a broader topic. There was basically no reason to believe this wasn't the case here, and the incredibly rude response from both of you to a user being helpful is really not a good look.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

It's exceedingly common for a question about one narrow thing to be an indicator of desire for knowledge about a broader topic

It's MUCH more common for a question about one thing to be an indicator of desire for knowledge of just one thing.

There was basically no reason to believe this wasn't the case here

Except for Occam's Razor and, you know, how language works.

the incredibly rude response from both of you to a user being helpful is really not a good look.

You're the one being incredibly rude by insisting that an illogical assumption was the only possible interpretation of a straightforward question and that pointing that out is somehow bad.

If I asked you if it's raining, would you link me to a deep dive about evaporation and atmospheric pressure? Do you think that would be helpful?

[–] [email protected] -1 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

You’re the one being incredibly rude by insisting that an illogical assumption was the only possible interpretation

No, I'm pushing back against how rude the two of you are being.

If you had just stayed silent because you weren't even involved in this, and if the other user had given a polite "thanks, but I'm already aware of this and just wanted an answer to that one question", things might have been different.

But that's not what happened. You came in guns blazing, and so did they. Ironic, considering further down the thread they also made it very clear that they don't already know the full context here.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

I made one flippant but accurate comment for laughs.

You're the one who made a huge deal about it by holding your incorrect assumptions to be undeniable Truth.

Just give the windmills you're tilting at a fucking rest already.