this post was submitted on 07 May 2025
879 points (98.2% liked)

Buy European

5780 readers
1568 users here now

Overview:

The community to discuss buying European goods and services.


Matrix Chat


Rules:

  • Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. No direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments.

  • Do not use this community to promote Nationalism/Euronationalism. This community is for discussing European products/services and news related to that. For other topics the following might be of interest:

  • Include a disclaimer at the bottom of the post if you're affiliated with the recommendation.

  • No russian suggestions.

Feddit.uk's instance rules apply:

  • No racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia or xenophobia
  • No incitement of violence or promotion of violent ideologies
  • No harassment, dogpiling or doxxing of other users
  • Do not share intentionally false or misleading information
  • Do not spam or abuse network features.
  • Alt accounts are permitted, but all accounts must list each other in their bios.
  • No generative AI content

Benefits of Buying Local:

local investment, job creation, innovation, increased competition, more redundancy.

European Instances

Lemmy:

Matrix:


Related Communities:

Buy Local:

Continents:

European:

Buying and Selling:

Boycott:

Countries:

Companies:

Stop Publisher Kill Switch in Games Practice:


Banner credits: BYTEAlliance


founded 3 months ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I'm not even going to pretend that BlueSky is more open than any Fediverse tool designed with federation in mind from the ground up. BlueSky is certainly not Mastodon or Lemmy, but it's not Meta AI-pushing crap like WhatsApp either.

Let's do a thought experiment. What if we would get a Wikipedia like NGO with proper funding setting up a EU based BlueSky instance? It won't be the decentralized dream of Fediverse, perhaps, but it could still prove useful. I think Twitter was successful because of its unified, global reaching platform appeal, not in spite of it, and the fact that users flock to BlueSky tells me that appeal is still there. Having a bit more decentralization in that mix just makes it better, but Mastodon shows that decentralization is not sufficient to give a platform a wide appeal.

As context: I'm one of those people that donates annually to Wikipedia, but I have no interest or capacity in managing a decentralized federation server in my basement. Lots of kudos to the people that do!

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 8 hours ago

I think what we are missing is some sort of "unify onboarding portal"

[โ€“] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I remember 2009

The future of technology was bright

https://developers.facebook.com/blog/post/110/

https://gmail.googleblog.com/2008/11/say-hello-to-gmail-voice-and-video-chat.html?m=1

Instead of selling competing protocols, companies and non profits came together to talk togetherโ€ฆ so that we could too.

Honestly Iโ€™d be a lot less negative of bluesky if it added native ActivityPub.

XMPP was added back in the day to W3 internet standard, as ActivityPub has.

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

Ah, the "don't be evil days". I'm old enough to remember Jabber was a thing. We really took a hard right at some point, didn't we? Technologically speaking, I'm not getting political.

And don't get me wrong, I'm not a BlueSky fanboy either. Their implementation of DMs simply sucks from an open standards POV. I just think they deserve a bit more credit than Zuckersoft. A lot of people I admire are active over there, reason enough for me to stick around. But I'm not giving up on Lemmy either.