this post was submitted on 08 May 2025
401 points (99.0% liked)
People Twitter
6938 readers
738 users here now
People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.
RULES:
- Mark NSFW content.
- No doxxing people.
- Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
- No bullying or international politcs
- Be excellent to each other.
- Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
For what it's worth, and maybe I'm naive, but I read that comment not about not meeting some criteria of what appears on a driver's license... But instead rebuking the notion that JD has acted with the integrity required to achieve "manhood".
English has really massacred the ability to clearly articulate concepts around biology, identifying as a boy or girl, and then having lived in such a way to have "ascended" to "manhood/womanhood".
JD Vance is a boy if he says he's a boy. Being a man isn't so simple. I reject that he is a man.
Ignoring the bit where they call him trans as an insult...
Yeah re-reading that line, I think you're right that they intended "trans" to mean "masqueradeding as".
I agree with the sentiment, but you're right, it's not cool to use "trans" for that purpose. Thanks for poking me to more carefully consider how the word was used here.
I think they understood you were fighting fire with fire. What they were saying is that more people get burned from fires than just the people who set them.