Looks like this got deleted from the original community where I posted it, so re-posting what I can remember here.
This screenshot is from a post I made on my city's subreddit.
The ACLU is saying it is "the stuff of authoritarian surveillance states, and has no place in American policing.”
“Until now, no American police department has been willing to risk the massive public blowback from using such a brazen face recognition surveillance system,” said Nathan Freed Wessler, deputy director of ACLU’s Speech, Privacy, and Technology Project. “By adopting this system–in secret, without safeguards, and at tremendous threat to our privacy and security–the City of New Orleans has crossed a thick red line.
The NOPD has stopped using it since WaPo began investigating because it violated a city ordinance, but federal agents (ICE) and state police are still using the real time tracking app.
I realized after reading an Axios article about it on Wednesday that the ordinance was created after the mayor, suddenly asked the city to lift a blanket ban on the technology and other controversial predictive policing policies.
The city's mayor has been facing federal charges regarding a scandal for several years and is currently just running out the clock on her last term as mayor. She has also been accused of other corruption such as accepting gifts as bribes in the past
The ban on predictive policing policies was originally created following the end of a secret partnership between Palantir and the city of New Orleans from ~2012-2018.
Months after the city first abandoned it's contract with Palantir, Mayor Cantrell seemed to be looking for loopholes that would allow her to continue using controversial predictive policing
I have tried to avoid pile-on critique of the mayor, and I actually voted her the first time she ran. However, one of the most common questions people in my city ask, is "how has she not been arrested?" I want to stress this is my own speculation, but given the details that are emerging now, I do wonder if these charges may have been related to why she so willingly turned over the city's privacy to the federal government in 2022?
The proposed ordinance, if passed, would largely reverse the council’s blanket bans on the use facial recognition and characteristic tracking software, which is similar to facial recognition but for identifying race, gender, outfits, vehicles, walking gait and other attributes. One provision also appears to walk back the city’s ban on predictive policing and cell-site simulators — which intercept and spy on cell phone calls — to locate people suspected of certain serious crimes.
That provision could, for the first time, give the city explicit permission to use a whole host of surveillance technology in certain circumstances, including voice recognition, x-ray vans, “through the wall radar,” social media monitoring software, “tools used to gain unauthorized access to a computer,” and more.
Lastly the proposal would allow the city to use “social media or communications software or applications for the purpose of communicating with the public, provided such use does not include the affirmative use of any face surveillance.” The Lens asked Tidwell and Green why this was included and what it was meant to allow, but neither responded.
While she may not have realized it at the time, the removal of the ban, along with her oddly warm welcome of the Governor's own state police force, Troop Nola, has placed the entire city in danger as the 2025 Trump administration continues to remove protection for civil rights and liberties as well as oversight for potential abuse of NSA surveillance
Louisiana State Police (LSP) Troop Nola, are now permanently established in the city and cannot be regulated by city policy and regulations. This means that they can also not be regulated by the same city ordinance that compelled the NOPD to pause their use of the controversial surveillance and real time tracking notifications.
As of yesterday, the Justice Department decided to stop investigating civil rights accusations previously made against LSP, while Louisiana Gov. Jeff Landry and his long time friend Attorney General Liz Murrill, were reported to have celebrated the decision.
It's funny how they creep up on us, right? São Paulo also just casually advertised locking some drug kingpin up using mass surveillance and face recognition this year. And nobody seems to care
Yeah, anytime you hear casual mentions of facial recognition or biosensor data being used to prove something in a case, it should be setting off alarm bells.
I'm assuming most people would think, why is it a bad thing if it's just being used against people like a drug kingpin for serious crimes?
A. Because like any other questionable police method (whether it's entering homes without warrants, use of excessive force, or harassment and intimidation tactics) we should be a little more smart at this point in history after learning the same lessons sooo many times already, that the potential for abuse and use against people for completely non justifiable reasons always exists, especially when you have zero regulations regarding how it's used.
B. If elections continue in the U.S. (big if, but this point should go for both sides) you have to consider if you're using even the most basic reasoning skills, that if sides that control the power switch (right to left or left to right), you not only face consequences of that technology being used by the other side to do something you don't support, but you also have the potential for cases like the drug kingpin to be overturned if laws change, and it can be proven the tech was used improperly to collect evidence.
It's not really an infrequent occurrence in the U.S. People who are innocent are railroaded and locked up for things they never did, while people who are clearly guilty are let off on a technicality after it's shown that evidence was improperly or illegally obtained.