this post was submitted on 27 May 2025
163 points (96.6% liked)

World News

46815 readers
4172 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago (3 children)

That does raise an interesting question though. What would happen to those treaties if Canada decided to officially become fully independent of the crown? I don't think anything is really stopping that from happening other than there not really being a significant upside for Canada.

Also side question, is the king (and I guess the entire royal family) considered a citizen of Canada and all the other countries that apparently never really got their independence from England? That's got to be incredibly weird for someone marrying into the royal family. "Congratulations you married a royal, here's your new citizenship to a dozen different countries most of which you've probably never set foot in before".

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago

The treaties, as they stand, are no longer acceptable arbitration mechanisms by which the world operates politically. They were initially made in extremely bad faith, taking advantage of people who had never bargained with Europeans before.

This is a contentious and complicated issue and the Crown, behind which the Canadian Federal government shields itself from having to negotiate new indigenous agreements, is happy to remain a Commonwealth country for the time being. If the time came to become independent, these agreements would likely require some considerable rework to be taken seriously.

The king of England is the head of state, and automatically inherits citizenship through that position.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago

If Canada became fully independent from the Crown we'd have to draw up a completely new constitution as the current one is tightly tied to the Crown. Personally, I don't trust anyone these days to create a new constitution, as an unfortunate chunk of the country seems to want to eliminate current rights as it is. For as much as some Canadians want or demand to remove the Crown from Canada, it's really not feasible, and could potentially (probably) completely destroy the country.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago

I imagine that every law that mentions the monarch of England would become redrafted to be relevant like we did with the EU laws when we left.