this post was submitted on 16 Jun 2025
832 points (96.8% liked)

Political Memes

8579 readers
4326 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CileTheSane 1 points 4 days ago (10 children)

I’ll have to disagree with you on this. Based on my research I did not find conclusive evidence on this.

Well based on my research if we stop arguing about trans people in sports and just let people play (because sports don't actually matter) everyone on earth will become billionaires!

It's easy to say things, I really do not care what some rando on the Internet came up with by "doing their own research" unless they have receipts. That's how we got anti-vaxxers and flat earthers.

That’s a well known problem. Sadly, not much we can do to fix it without creating other problems

So we know this is a problem but fixing it isn't important. Trans people in sports we don't know is a problem, trying to "fix" it is creating other problems, so why is that more important to focus on?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (9 children)

I really do not care what some rando on the Internet came up with by "doing their own research" unless they have receipts

I hope you’re aware this applies to you as well

I don’t want to take the time to prove you my research and shit. Maybe someone will take the time to do it, and props to them.

That's how we got anti-vaxxers and flat earthers.

Blindly repeating the opinion of the majority on a same platform is also a great way to spread misinformation. I’m simply giving my opinion in hopes of creating doubt in people's mind so that they fact check it and get the truth. Most people stating things aren’t giving out the sources like that, and asking for it each time the facts are different is a great way to prevent those people from speaking at all.

Barely anyone check, so if a thread is full of people saying the same thing, one will assume it’s the truth but it might not be

So we know this is a problem but fixing it isn't important. Trans people in sports we don't know is a problem, trying to "fix" it is creating other problems, so why is that more important to focus on?

You’re going off topic here

[–] CileTheSane 0 points 3 days ago (3 children)

I don’t want to take the time to prove you my research and shit

Of course. "I've done my own research and come to a conclusion that contradicts Science. No, I will not share any of it, just trust that I am right and scientists are wrong." You know you are unable to defend your "conclusion" because you have nothing to back it up.

Barely anyone check, so if a thread is full of people saying the same thing, one will assume it’s the truth but it might not be

Which is exactly why I'm calling out your claims.

You’re going off topic here

No, this is very much on topic. You've claimed that you've received bans for no reason, for simply saying it's important to keep an open mind about banning trans people in sports. It took very little time to reach the obvious conclusion that you don't care about inequality in sports or you'd be concerned about the inequality money provides (you don't), and you don't care about how many other problems trying to fix that would create because trying to fix the issue of trans people in sports (who don't have an outsized advantage) creates significantly more problems, especially to a marginalized group of people (although as always it also overflows into cis people who don't properly fit into the cookie cutter mold).

You're trying to claim you're Just Asking Questions, but it takes very little time interacting with you for your views to become abundantly clear. You are not nearly as clever or subtle as you think.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

conclusion that contradicts Science

What science? You’ve not given any source to back your claims. Science does NOT say that transgender women athletes and cisgender women athletes are equal.

you don't care about inequality in sports or you'd be concerned about the inequality money provides

How the fuck is this related? Rules can be decided easily, but making it so that each person has equal chance to get money is impossible and out of the question anyways. If you want to, then yea it changes the outcome, but we’re not fucking talking about all inequalities that exist else we wouldn’t stop talking. I’m focusing on a specific angle that has a high impact on the subject and that we can actually have an impact on.

(who don't have an outsized advantage)

If you want to play this game then sure. Your conclusion contradicts science. If you don’t provide sufficient proof then you’re lying just like me I guess

You're trying to claim you're Just Asking Questions, but it takes very little time interacting with you for your views to become abundantly clear. You are not nearly as clever or subtle as you think.

You’re acting like a SJW and a science guy but you’re just pushing your own opinion without providing any proof and just spreading lies like "science says this" when it doesn’t.

You’re not defending anything but idiocy

I’m done talking with you. I’ve lost enough time to an hypocritical liar. There’s no crowd and this is going nowhere. We’re just both losing our time.

[–] CileTheSane 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I’m done talking with you

Demands sources, makes it clear they won't read any sources...

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago

If you do have, I'll read it, but I'm done talking if you're not coming back with proof

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)