this post was submitted on 19 Jun 2025
951 points (98.1% liked)

Greentext

6535 readers
782 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

These small towns would still be an hour+ away from large cities, even with European speed high speed rail.

Like for me, the nearest "big town" is about 100 miles from me, which is about a 2hr drive. And, at least from some quick googling, it looks like most commuter rail in France tops out at about 100mph. A train would not bring in more people haha

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

Yeah, while I'm a huge advocate for an American Shinkansen, there's really 4 zones of America for train speeds. East of the Appalachians its fast and easy and rail already works easy. West of them but east of the Mississippi, you're gonna need high speed rail, but it'll be somewhat similar to Europe. Between the Mississippi and the west coast, you're gonna need high speed rail and quite a bit of patience. And on the west coast, you'll hit up small cities, but honestly it'd be a great second high speed line after the New York-Chicago

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You'd be suprised how many people commute more than an hour by car. The prospect of having affordable housing with more job opportunities will certainly bring in more people.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

France spends ~$15 million/mile for high speed commuter rail. Which means that line would cost $1.5 billion.

I don't think it's bringing in that many more people. Even when you amortize it across all of the little cities it would go through

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Implying the line would stop at the town and not carry on to the next. Also, how much is being spent on building and maintaining freeways?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago

too much, which is why I propose dirt highways with 45mph speed limits. Low initial cost, drivers drive safer, and helps the towing industry grow.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago

Even when you amortize it across all of the little cities

Please read the comment in it's entirety before responding ❤️