this post was submitted on 19 Jun 2025
192 points (99.0% liked)

Space

1476 readers
232 users here now

A community to discuss space & astronomy through a STEM lens

Rules

  1. Be respectful and inclusive. This means no harassment, hate speech, or trolling.
  2. Engage in constructive discussions by discussing in good faith.
  3. Foster a continuous learning environment.

Also keep in mind, mander.xyz's rules on politics

Please keep politics to a minimum. When science is the focus, intersection with politics may be tolerated as long as the discussion is constructive and science remains the focus. As a general rule, political content posted directly to the instance’s local communities is discouraged and may be removed. You can of course engage in political discussions in non-local communities.


Related Communities

🔭 Science

🚀 Engineering

🌌 Art and Photography


Other Cool Links


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 hours ago

I mean, this may sound stupid, but I have 'prototyped' this kind of idea in a highly modified KSP, KSP Realism Overhaul, with a whole suite of realism mods, space and aerodynamics physics overhauls, realistic weights and thrust values and random failures, coded my own flight routines, blah blah blah.

It generally works in concept, and yes the crazy part is that it is basically the same or quite similar to the original Gateway idea...

But that all got thrown out the window with NASA higher ups going all in on SpaceX.

Look up Kathy Leuders. She personally did the assessment of Starship + Heavy Booster as reasonable and adequate... and I do mean personally. She wrote the whole document in first person.

Then, she resigned a few months after that, and now gets paid handsomly as an employee for SpaceX.

It is the exact same regulatory capture bullshit, the industry exec to government official to lobbyist charade that plauges other industries.