this post was submitted on 08 Aug 2023
1673 points (87.9% liked)

Technology

62117 readers
7216 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
1673
Why you shouldn't use Brave Browser (www.spacebar.news)
submitted 2 years ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
847 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] avidamoeba 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

It really doesn't matter what Firefox'es codebase is though. To a web developer it's a black box. It may as well be a bowl of COBOL spaghetti. So long as enough people use it and it behaves differently to a web developer than Google's Chromium or Chrome, the goal you mentioned is achieved. This is why I don't buy this argument. If Firefox'es black box is as compatible, as fast or faster and as good or better than Chrome's, more users will use it than if it isn't.