Probably not.
As a #FuckCars person, I absolutely support the need for cars and car infrastructure for many use cases, including yours. It's why I want to get as many of us who don't need to be in cars, out of them.
Yeah, capital is fundamentally opposed to democracy because democracy means people without capital can get more power in society than those that hold more capital. What could possibly be the result of a system that removes the brakes from capital exercising its power other than the erosion of the power people without significant capital have. Which then results in further capital accumulation, which results in further disempowerment of regular people, in a feedback loop. Hell we even shoveled important public property into private capital's hands... And here we are at near historic level of income and wealth inequality.
And it isn't just me saying this. If you examine some of neoliberalism icons' musings, you'd discover they see democracy as a hindrance to the full realization of an absolute free market economy, for this exact reason. People tend to vote against the privatization of public services they depend on, and against stripping labour rights to name a couple of things that tend to rain on neoliberalism's parade.
Say no to Space Balls.
58% of Democrats said they approved of the anti-ICE protests, compared to 15% of Republicans.
I wonder how does it compare to previous iterations of large protests.
It sounds like anyone who matters around Ford says this is a fringe no one is listening to and that what they're pushing loses elections in Canada.
Imagine if instead of an escape lane, you park in front of the entrance, get out of your truck, enter through the front door and order at the count.
And people, most often people.
She's a gem.
And the prices are falling right?
It makes sense for capital, until it destabilizes the system due to depressing wages, till aggregate demand falls to the point there's not enough people buying the production.