this post was submitted on 21 May 2021
22 points (100.0% liked)

Privacy

33192 readers
317 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I broke my phone a few months ago and I hadn't use a phone since I didn't need it until now. I'm willing to buy one that's around under 500$. I'm thinking of getting google pixel maybe, any recommendations?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 3 years ago (1 children)

I'm not from USA and "cultism" is not for me, I'm enthusiast of open source and don't trust proprietary software and hardware. Sadly, but there is no 100% hardware ready for end-users, so I'm just trying to find a balance.

Btw, any device has proprietary "security" components, so it's all about "smells less", not " trusted one".

My own opinion - GrapheneOS is good one, using it on Pixel devices is a trade-off.

Anyway, that thread comes to holywar and I don't want to take part in it, my arguments and thoughts you can find in comments above, if you disagree with them - OK, I'm fine with it. Just shared my thoughts

[โ€“] [email protected] -2 points 3 years ago

It is a fundamentally wrong argument when it is said that other device hardware has not been audited, because if one were to avoid proprietary components, the lesser of them existed in the memory and security domains, the better it would be for reduxing attack surface.

Look at Intel ME, Apple T2 or Qualcomm Snapdragon's Hexagon DSP flaws.