this post was submitted on 20 Jan 2021
23 points (96.0% liked)
Asklemmy
49287 readers
430 users here now
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
Search asklemmy ๐
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
- Open-ended question
- Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
- Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
- An actual topic of discussion
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
- Lemmyverse: community search
- sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
- [email protected]: a community for finding communities
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~
founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I would say the main problem with Wikipedia is the fact that it is all controlled by a single organisation in the United States. So no matter where someone lives or which language of Wikipedia they want to contribute to, in the end that organisation in the United States can decide whether or not it is acceptable. That might not be so bad for things like math or science, where an objective truth exists. But when it comes to topics like politics, there are many groups who hold different opinions, and it is impossible to give an objective truth.
The best way to solve this problem is likely with completely separate wiki instances run by different countries, organisations or political groups. These could use ActivityPub to federate with each other, and share some of the articles. For example, articles about math could be shared across most instances, while each instance might have its own version of an article for a controversial political topic.
Implementing something like that seems very hard though, and so far I dont think anyone has tried to implement a federated wiki.
Ward Cunningham the original wiki inventor has also invented a federated wiki. Seems to be quite dead though.
The layout/ux is really complicated, most people would probably not use it for that reason alone.
Yes, but there's worse: to edit a page, you need to host an instance of the wiki yourself.
I wonder how that would handle article conflicts.
I think it works using forks, which means several versions can coexist. You can accept or decline a fork of another user on your instance.
Maybe: https://github.com/xwiki-contrib/application-activitypub
To be honest Wikipedia has done a pretty good job of keeping most things civil and respectful without going into US propaganda. Also, it should be noted that differences do de facto exists between languages.