this post was submitted on 30 Oct 2023
60 points (95.5% liked)

politics

20567 readers
5529 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Former Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) is getting a primary challenger in his reelection race for his House seat representing the state’s 20th congressional district.

David Giglio, who previously lost a congressional bid for the state’s 13th District, is running as an “America First Republican” who will “fight alongside President Donald Trump in 2024 as he WAGES WAR against the corrupt uniparty,” according to Giglio’s campaign website.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 year ago (2 children)

We are witnessing the big issue with gerrymandered districts.

The more gerrymandered the more batshit insane people you get into office since they always win their primaries and then will always win the general.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

Anything could happen but I don't think this guy has a chance amazing McCarthy. I'm sure McCarthy has pretty deep ties in his district. I'd love it if Giglio beat McCarthy and then a moderate Democrat won the seat though.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

If you're trying to gerrymander in a sinister way you don't want to win counties in a land slide. You want to split up your opponents' counties and concentrate the rest in as few counties as possible so that they lose.

Here's an example with two parties: X and O

Undivided population:
XXXXXXOOOOOO

Situation 1:
XXX XXX OOO OOO

Situation 2:
XXO XXO XXO OOO

Situation 1 is probably the fairest because the population is 50/50 and they have 2 X representatives and 2 O representatives.

Situation 2 is gerrymandered by party X to give them 3 representatives, but it takes fewer Xs to switch and damage the majority. The Os have no real X challengers in the 4th district (OOO).