this post was submitted on 19 Oct 2021
17 points (100.0% liked)
Asklemmy
44656 readers
909 users here now
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
Search asklemmy ๐
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
- Open-ended question
- Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
- Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
- An actual topic of discussion
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
- Lemmyverse: community search
- sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
- [email protected]: a community for finding communities
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
The modlog is staying the same, and it will always show what got removed. This is more about when you go to a removed post or community, should it show all the info.
Hmm, ok I see, My bad that I miss-understood.
I think there is the need to hit a sweet-spot between using the upcoming "purge" as little as possible (for transparency reasons) but not leave an instance-admin open to legal issues if the content of a post can't be left publicly accessible.
Might add unnecessary complexity, but how about letting the moderator choose with the check-box if the content is blanked out or not when removing a post?
I'd rather purge and mod remove be distinct, that would be overly complex IMO to add more weird types of removes outside of those two.