this post was submitted on 07 Nov 2023
2216 points (92.8% liked)

Microblog Memes

6717 readers
3067 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 year ago (57 children)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (47 children)

I'm all for an individual decreasing their own consumption for the environment. I try to do that. But decreasing someone else's quality of life is where it gets dicy. You can very easily get discrimination.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Put a high upper limit only. Don't touch the bottomline.

For example, no more than 4 cars per person: Average Joe won't even know this rule exists but it will still reduce mineral mining due to people who collect cars.

Possible problems with my shitty example: Now a car is a controlled substance. Who decides the limit and how? What if there is a mental disease (with a better example this would make more sense) which requires a person to have 20 cars?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Hell yeah, 100% tax over certain net worth.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (45 replies)
load more comments (54 replies)