this post was submitted on 11 Jan 2022
26 points (82.5% liked)

Asklemmy

44824 readers
1101 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -5 points 3 years ago (3 children)

No, it's very difficult to understand. It's basically brainless. Too many ambiguous words.

For instance, can you define what it means if a country is "great", or if it is the opposite of "great"? Would your definition match anyone else's?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 years ago (1 children)

OPs question is not about whether you can objectively define that a country is ‘’great’’ but rather what is it that constitutes their country as ‘’greatest’’ or exceptional in the (subjective) minds of many Americans nowadays?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) (1 children)

OPs question is not about whether you can objectively define that a country is ‘’great’’

No, but its formulation seems to imply that there is such a definition, that the US obviously don't satisfy it but that a lot of americans mistakenly believe that it does.

Also, feels a bit strange that you address that response to the one comment (ok, one of the two ) that address that point rather than to any of the ones who assume that the US are objectively not a great country.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 years ago

No, but its formulation seems to imply that there is such a definition, that the US obviously don’t satisfy it but that a lot of americans mistakenly believe that it does.

The definition doesn't exist, but yet, yes, many Americans do believe it still.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 years ago

English is not my mother tongue and as a rusty learner I can say that at least for me the question is pretty straight forward. Judging by your comment you have a way more level than the required in order to understand it

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 years ago (1 children)

It really does seem like you're the only one who's making a fuss about this. It may be that you're lacking common sense or basic comprehension. Hiding behind the veil of semantics really shows this.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 3 years ago (1 children)

I'm trying to point out something to you that you may never have realized. Certainly, no one else seems to notice it either.

The word "great" is a meaningless word unless it is used carefully. It has no semantic content whatsoever when used in OP's context. To use it in the question strongly implies that the question is asking about some emotional state. At which point, the question is "why do people like their homes".

That has more to do with monkey psychology than anything else, and is a dumb, nonsense question if you do understand it's about monkey psychology and a dumb, nonsense question even if you don't understand that.

Other problematic words in the question also support my assertion.

It may be that you’re lacking common sens

What's "common sense"? From the standpoint of sociology, that's nothing more than universally accepted norms/belief systems. I'd be flattered to be told I lacked those, if only you were clever enough to have meant it.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 years ago

You're an idiot. That's all I have to say.