The game got way better two years ago, and it continues to grow and get updates.
this post was submitted on 26 May 2024
67 points (91.4% liked)
Fallout
2574 readers
58 users here now
Welcome to c/Fallout, the unofficially official community to discuss the franchise.
Be sure to check out [email protected], moderated by a friend of ours :)
Join us on https://matrix.to/#/#falloutnewmatrix:matrix.org!
Rules:
- Don't be a dick (this includes bigotry/prejudice)
- Stay on topic
- Mildly NSFW content is allowed, but anything more is removed
PS: Don't use the fandom! please use fallout.wiki for everything instead.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
No offense to anyone who enjoys them, but I'm so sick of the "[bad] game is good now!" narrative. Fallout 76 is a six year-old game, and was in development for several years before that. In the context of game reviews (which I care about), Release Date is important, it's when it has the most exposure, the most sales, and when review embargos end. So if you can't have your game fully-completed by then, you probably shouldn't release a half-finished, buggy game. Right?
Games like No Man's Sky, Cyberpunk 2077, and others might literally be better now than at launch... But what are we supposed to do, have reviews regularly updated to match the current state of a game? Actually, I would like that, if games journalists could do this. But until then, the game needs to be fully completed on launch, or suffer your permanent bad score...