this post was submitted on 07 Dec 2023
45 points (100.0% liked)

[Dormant] moved to !space@mander.xyz

10425 readers
88 users here now

This community is dormant, please find us at !space@mander.xyz

You can find the original sidebar contents below:


Rules

  1. Be respectful and inclusive.
  2. No harassment, hate speech, or trolling.
  3. Engage in constructive discussions.
  4. Share relevant content.
  5. Follow guidelines and moderators' instructions.
  6. Use appropriate language and tone.
  7. Report violations.
  8. Foster a continuous learning environment.

Picture of the Day

The Busy Center of the Lagoon Nebula


Related Communities

🔭 Science

🚀 Engineering

🌌 Art and Photography


Other Cool Links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Shawdow194@kbin.social 16 points 1 year ago

"... But it worked. We had lots of margin on that main chute."

Love NASA over engineering

[–] Sigmatics 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

"In the design plans for the system, the word 'main' was used inconsistently between the device that sends the electric signals, and the device that receives the signals," NASA said in a written statement. "On the signal side, 'main' meant the main parachute. In contrast, on the receiver side 'main' was used as a reference to a pyrotechnic that fires to release the parachute canister cover and deploy the drogue.

"Engineers connected the two mains, causing the parachute deployment actions to occur out of order," NASA said.

[–] Diplomjodler@feddit.de 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I used to work as a technical writer and I always got shat on by engineers who worked along the lines of "real men don't write documentation". But those guys won't read this because reading is just too hard for them.

[–] LazaroFilm@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I guess I’m not a real man. I read documentation as a hobby. Started with Legos, and now it’s reading component i2s communication tables…

[–] Diplomjodler@feddit.de 4 points 1 year ago

I'm not saying all engineers are like that. I've met a few capable ones. But the mediocre and less than mediocre ones usually have the biggest chips on their shoulders.

[–] threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Legos

Fine, I'll be that person: ~~*Lego~~ :)

Edit; I stand corrected: *LEGO

[–] LazaroFilm@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Just let it gos

[–] pennomi@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Technically the word LEGO® is always written in full capitals because it’s a trademark.

The LEGO name is always spelled in all capital letters and the bricks (and/or elements) must always be referred to as “LEGO bricks” (or “LEGO elements”) – never “LEGOs” or “legos”.

And

The first time the Trademarks appear in a headline and in the following text, they should be accompanied by the relevant symbol: the LEGO trademark and SERIOUS PLAY by the ®symbol

Thereafter, the symbols need not to be used more on the same page, or in the same chapter.

Indeed! I stand corrected.

[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Why wasn't this tested?

[–] Blaster_M@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Thade780@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Like when I forget landing legs and the ship is ready to ~~vaporize~~ ~~explode~~ ~~smash into debris~~ lithobrake.

[–] CM400@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

lithobrake

Brilliant word, thanks for using it.

[–] silencioso@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It always fascinated me how, something apparently as simple as a parachute, is so hard to do well. We can operate a fucking drone flying repeatedly on the surface of other planet but we struggle to open a piece of cloth.

[–] Sigmatics 5 points 1 year ago

Metal and plastic is easy, controlling cloth is hard