this post was submitted on 03 Mar 2024
637 points (100.0% liked)

196

17032 readers
1106 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 117 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Implying human managers are held accountable.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Depends on the level of manager. DM at Walmart? You might as well not even have the title.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 11 months ago (1 children)

They can be held accountable, they just won't 99% of the time.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

Why should they, when they can delegate that, amirite?

[–] [email protected] 12 points 11 months ago

Only when basic grunt scapegoats fail to repel the call for accountability, a management level unit is sacrificed.

[–] [email protected] 88 points 11 months ago (1 children)

A computer can never find out. That is why a computer must never fuck around.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 11 months ago

Canadian airline is complaining about finding out when their computer fucked around.

[–] [email protected] 46 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Not accountable? But I thought they did math?

[–] [email protected] 13 points 11 months ago

Accountingable

[–] [email protected] 10 points 11 months ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

And they are very countable.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 11 months ago

Now do corporations!

[–] [email protected] 9 points 11 months ago (2 children)

I disagree.

Machines are made by humans, and can be built responsibly.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 11 months ago

But then the one who is to be held accountable is the human who made it, or the human who used it.

When a plane crashes it isnt the planes fault either.

[–] yetAnotherUser 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, but even machines that are "built responsibly" (whatever that may mean) can make mistakes. Correction: they will make mistakes, because decision making isn't linear, and afaik computers are only good at linear tasks, such as calculations. And once they do, who should be held accountable? The AI's creator? The person/company who accepted whatever decision the AI made? Or nobody? When people are deciding, it's a bit easier to know who to blame. But how do you do it when the decision is by an algorithm?

And sure, maybe AI's can help in decision making, but shouldn't decisions be made by people in the end?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

And sure, maybe AI’s can help in decision making, but shouldn’t decisions be made by people in the end?

It depends on what decision you're looking at.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 11 months ago

GPT: Hold my beer!

[–] [email protected] 6 points 11 months ago (1 children)

What does being held accountable even mean? Punishment? Or just removeval of their services bc well machines can be removed from service.

If a machine stops working we hold it "accountable" by servicing it or throwing it out. Plus there are plenty machines that make decisions and we use the without much fuss

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago

Exactly. Responsibility doesn't mean that you go to jail. It means that you fix your mistakes.