this post was submitted on 05 Mar 2024
21 points (100.0% liked)

Harm reduction & Safe supply

92 readers
8 users here now

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Judging by this. I wouldn't touch that website.

[–] CaractacusPotts 0 points 11 months ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

When someone says they can't access the link, saying "it works for me" is not the answer.

[–] CaractacusPotts 1 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Best I can do. What would your answer be?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

If you didn't see it, I gave them a wayback machine link!

[–] CaractacusPotts 1 points 11 months ago

Let me add to that. I'm not technologically savvy. Things work or they don't, I have no ability with problem-solving and computers.

[–] LostWon 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Seems to me that recommendation was made because the site doesn't even bother with GDPR compliance. It's up to each individual what they decide to do, but for many people, that can raise red flags about the site's commitment to users' privacy.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago

Have the republicans all become Nurgle worshipers or something?