this post was submitted on 03 Oct 2024
-234 points (20.3% liked)

Pleasant Politics

316 readers
2 users here now

Politics without the jerks.

This community is watched over by a ruthless robot moderator to keep out bad actors. I don't know if it will work. Read [email protected] for a full explanation. The short version is don't be a net negative to the community and you can post here.

Rules

Post political news, your own opinions, or discussion. Anything goes.

All posts must follow the slrpnk sitewide rules.

No personal attacks, no bigotry, no spam. Those will get a manual temporary ban.

founded 7 months ago
MODERATORS
all 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 11 points 4 months ago

He’s a walking mansplain

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 months ago (2 children)

I mean, that’s the opinion of the author. I hope they speak for a majority of voters, but there’s nothing in the article to suggest it. In fact, it requires a little bit of consideration, something woefully lacking in the electorate.

The reports I got about the vp debate from actual viewers were that it was no knock-out, not even a clear win which means it was effectively a loss or - at best - a draw.

Don’t coast for a single second - evil billionaires are winning. We get ONE SHOT and then it’s off to wherever we voted.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago

I agree with that. It didn't feel like a win, it felt like a draw. It felt like Vance wriggled and wormed his way out of answering anything, and Walz was overly charitable.

I get that's how Walz is—he's the nice dad—but nobody will remember that he was nice (except neurodivergent people like me). People want clear winners, and they'll remember that neither of them won, and that's a problem if you're trying to energize your base to turn out to vote.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

You know I was going to make a joke that it probably didn't work cuz no one watches vice presidential debates, but then I looked it up and it's 43 million? What the fuck is wrong with us?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Nothing is wrong with us. We all know there's a lot at stake, and at least 43mil are taking voting seriously.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

If someone bases their vote off of the vice presidential debate they are not taking their vote seriously.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago

True, but I would imagine those people are few. The 43mil are probably mostly people who have already made their decision.