this post was submitted on 20 Nov 2024
-20 points (22.2% liked)

Programming

18001 readers
183 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Rules

  • Follow the programming.dev instance rules
  • Keep content related to programming in some way
  • If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities [email protected]



founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Mirror is an entirely new concept in programming — just supply function signatures and some input-output examples, and AI does the rest.

all 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 months ago (1 children)

almost like a shitty prolog that won't work half the time!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

Doesn't prolog already "not work half the time"? (Disclaimer: I haven't used it.)

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

I don't mean this in a toxic way, but this is probably the worst idea I have seen yet with Ai in programming. People should use less Ai, and learn more how to program. It's better in the long term.

https://github.com/AZHenley/Mirror

Is the language and interpretation predictable and exact? If you install a newer version of the Ai, can the exact same code behavior be guaranteed? What's the benefit over using Ai tools that generate code in a static language, instead leaving it to be interpreted?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

People should use less Ai, and learn more how to program

Yes. Once you know how, you can see pitfalls with AI.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Most general purpose programming languages nowadays are designed to be easily human readable. But with this, I now have to understand the syntax of another "programming language" in addition to the programming language it outputs. How is this helpful in any way?

There are already plenty of template generators that can generate boiletplate code with parameters. This seems like a complete waste of time.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago

Even as a toy language if I can't tell what it's doing beyond interface with an llm prompt.. What good is it?

Consistency and validity of output is essentially impossible to prove, because this has all the accuracy of both humans famously bad at explaining their problems to machines who understand 80% of it.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago

Ah, a new esolang

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Interesting, but I never needed AI for coding. Well, twice, and I had to do changes, but would not use AI to generate code.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

I use the ai daily at work. But more as an interactive docs and refactoring tool.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago
// Hack the mainframe to skim pennies from ongoing transactions
async function addMoneyToMyBankAccount(dollarAmount: number): Promise<"success">

Alright let's go

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago

The obvious problem is that I would have been quicker to write the function yourself than the examples.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Could I do:

signature primes_less_than(x: number) -> [number]
example primes_less_than(2) = []
example primes_less_than(10) = [ 2, 3, 5, 7 ]
primes_less_than(10582319112759318014901241439012831231539517)

?

I don't pay for OpenAI, so I can't try the playground

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago

Ooooh, this oughta be good.