this post was submitted on 13 Dec 2024
286 points (82.8% liked)

Memes

46742 readers
964 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
286
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 30 points 2 months ago (1 children)

True in many cases, but there were wars before there was capitalism.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 months ago (10 children)

And in those times the causes were things like feudalism.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] [email protected] 28 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Yes, every non-capitalist country throughout history has been a beacon of peace lmao

Humans are human. Capitalism is absolutely a driver of some conflict, but conflict is driven not only by economic interests, but also political, ethnic, religious, and other interests.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Capitalism is the primary driver of wars, it determines the basic structure of what is and is not permissible, generates nation-states (these did not always exist, actually), and then creates the conditions by which the national bourgeoisie nation-states push for war in order to become international bourgeoisie (imperialists).

For example, the US keeps the middle east in a regular state of war to prevent them from having independent policies regarding oil. It is concerned about oil because of the petrodollar. It is concerned about the petrodollar because it is th3 primary financial war instrument by which it jeeps other countries sending superprofits its way and otherwise screwing with countries using interest rates. And it does those things because the US is the global seat of capital, it is where the big finance companies are based.

How many wars have there been in the middle east since 2000? How has the US been involved? Do they just do it for the thrill of domination?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Look dude, I'm not here to argue about the US's absolutely fucked foreign policy, and in absolutely no fucking way am I saying any one conflict is not driven in whole or in part by capitalism.

But "Capitalism is the primary driver of wars" is a fundamentally false statement. Just because it's a driver of some or even most modern conflicts does not make it "the primary driver of wars." War is a well documented and studied social phenomenon that predates capitalism by thousands of years, maybe millions. Fucking chimpanzee tribes war with each other. There are thousands upon thousands of wars throughout human history that prove your statement wrong.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I thought it would be implied that I'm speaking about modern times. The economic system is the msin driver in large societies, though. In Europe, prior to capitalism, the primary determinant was feudal interests.

Chimps don't have war. They fight, but is every skirmish a war? Wars come from creating and wielding armies.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

You are obviously wrong because you left out the entire USSR and what happened to Eastern Europe post WW2. Go read a history book!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

Your mind must have added the words "ever" somewhere in the meme. Meme is in present tense, so accurate.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 2 months ago

Capitalism is a source of so many problems, yet somehow you singed and missed.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 months ago (25 children)

I can't figure out exactly why Russia invaded Ukraine, but I don't think it's capitalism. The oligarchs certainly didn't appreciate it very much now. My guess is it was for some misguided desire for legacy?

load more comments (25 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 months ago (1 children)

This is as reductive as when people say religion is what causes all wars. Humans cause war. Race, religion, nationality, money, power,etc. All of them,and more, have been used as pretexts for war.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago

everybody wants to rule the world in some way or another even if it means killing everyone else smh

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

It's easy to forget capitalism (and imperialism) aren't the natural state of things and there were wars before it. Of course, that's doesn't mean it doesn't perpetuate and indeed requires wars and exploitation to continue existing.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 months ago

Oh man I was already beaten by a lemmy.world user saying something stupid

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago (4 children)

What about wars started by communist nations?

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago (5 children)

cool, so taiwan, tibet and mongolia don't have to worry at all

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Well IMO it is a bit simplistic to just toss it to capitalism.

I do agree that capitalists profit from wars and historically have started wars for profit, but the current conflicts in Ukraine and Gaza are a bit more complicated.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The Gaza colonialist takeover is as straighforward as you can get.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Dead people do not produce excess value, alive people do.

I hate to think that way but if you put yourself in the shoes of a capitalist exploiting Palestinians with the help of Israel I think would be much more profitable than killing them.

Just like in Germany during WW2 capitalist interests give way to fascism and hate.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Israel is a settler-colonial project, it exterminates Palestinians for land.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I do agree that it is settler-colonial project.

I also do not think land is the main purpose of the genocide. I think the extermination of Palestinians(and other Arabs) is the main reason, taking the land is a very good additional incentive.

But neither I nor You can know what happens in the heads of genocidal maniacs so we can only guess.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

We can only guess based on the economic structures, trends, and stated goals going back to the founding Zionists. It has always been a land grab, they are always seeking new land to sell and fuel its settler-colonial economy. Never attribute evil to madness when you can analyze the material and economic basis for it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

It's ignoring the crusades

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

Anybody reading Aristophanes in these times of demagogues and world wars? I just finished Birds and Peace. Studies of democracy, Greek hegemony, and hellenization feel like a refresher on familiar problems and their perspectives. I think he was writing about 250 years after Homer, and today we're writing about 250 years after the US framers.

load more comments
view more: next ›