Skeptic

Oh no!

Wait, they are quitting because they can't accept non-binary gender? Fuck 'em then.

The article by Kat Grant that simply points out that gender is more complex than binary.

The Jerry Coyne response that is the one which misconstrues Kat's article as conflating sex and gender (which it didn't) and was taken down by the FFRF, partially because it contains a bunch of stupid and false stereotypes like this.

But even here Grant misleads the reader. They argue, for example, that “Transgender people are no more likely to be sexual predators than other individuals.” Yet the facts support the opposite of this claim, at least for transgender women. A cross-comparison of statistics from the U.K. Ministry of Justice and the U.K. Census shows that while almost 20 percent of male prisoners and a maximum of 3 percent of female prisoners have committed sex offenses, at least 41 percent of trans-identifying prisoners were convicted of these crimes. Transgender, then, appear to be twice as likely as natal males and at least 14 times as likely as natal females to be sex offenders. While these data are imperfect because they’re based only on those who are caught, or on some who declare their female gender only after conviction, they suggest that transgender women are far more sexually predatory than biological women and somewhat more predatory than biological men. There are suggestions of similar trends in Scotland, New Zealand, and Australia.

Good riddance.

I feel vindicated. I've been calling Dawkins a self-absorbed shit heel for twenty years. Only good for people who were already questioning religion to rally around and echo their well-actually views.

For a skeptic, he failed at considering the context of anything he already agreed with. Hard not to be a sex offender when going to the bathroom, wearing the 'wrong' clothes and, in some cases, existing is considered an offense.