this post was submitted on 31 Dec 2024
59 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

9539 readers
898 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

  2. Election Interference / Misinformation

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
top 3 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 17 points 3 months ago (1 children)

"Now"...

Pretty sure Operation Beaver Drop was in the 70s. We've known that the increased water retention not only acts as a natural fire barrier, but it's incredibly beneficial to local biodiversity.

It's just that not only is there no money to be made in the process, wetlands can't really be used for anything that produces money.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Have shit not burn down doesn't make money, but it stops losing money.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

But the tax payers will have to pay to fix the burnt stuff so why should some oligarch care? They have money to make today if they clear cut the forest and drain the wetlands. The future generations can deal with the consequences.