this post was submitted on 21 Jan 2025
258 points (99.2% liked)

politics

19625 readers
4634 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Police officers who defended the Capitol during the January 6, 2021 riot condemned Donald Trump’s mass pardon of those involved, calling it a “miserable miscarriage of justice.”

Trump granted clemency to over 1,500 individuals, including those who assaulted law enforcement.

Former officers Harry Dunn and Aquilino Gonell criticized the pardons, highlighting lasting physical and emotional scars from the attack.

Both officers, now advocates against political violence, emphasized the erasure of accountability and warned of the dangers of Trump’s actions normalizing future violence.

top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 85 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Remember when the police unions backed trump. Enjoy your leopard.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

They will quickly forget once they get to start rounding up minorities

[–] [email protected] 51 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Back the Blue!*

~* = as long as they are beating up the people we want them to~

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

In his world, backing refers to backstabbing.

[–] [email protected] 48 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Anyone wanna guess who those same cops voted for?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago

In this particular instance, I'm going to doubt many of them voted for him because he was very vocal about planning to pardon the insurrectionists.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The schadenfreude is delicious seeing class traitors get shafted by the upper class, but at the end of the day trump has his extralegal brownshirts now.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

"class traitor". Go away with that bs, they did their country a service by protecting the integrity of the US democracy against a violent mob. I get being upset how the police handles many issues but they are still needed. I doubt we'd be better off without them completely and no one is reporting on cops that follow their job honorably. They are here to protect the people. Yes, the system needs to be improved and the cops need to be trained properly and transparency has to be increased. Its just I still think the executive needs someone to enforce laws. Judiciary and legislature are nothing without that aspect so stop being so condescending to those who defended democratically elected representatives back then against the mob.

I can see your issue with the police union endorsing trump but still. "class traitor", really?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago

American police do not exist to protect the populace, and this isn't just some philosophical "they act unethically a lot" thing, this is established by the Supreme Court that police have no duty to protect and serve despite it being emblazoned on everything. American police are at their core publicly funded private security for the assets of the wealthy and act as tools of harassment against anyone who would defy the wealthy.

Anyone who becomes a cop in the US is a class traitor. They become part of an apparatus of harm against the common person, every time a cop does something illegal, or every time the buddies look the other way, or lie about events on reports, it all contributes to a system of harm.

How to handle class traitors who've also been hurt by the system they uphold... I don't know... I 100% get not wanting to trust someone who participated in and furthered the harms done by cops, but, in being ideologically consistent, I also get that all people in the ideal society I'd like to see are given the opportunity to make amends and restore their position in society.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I mean, they're police officers, they have access to the resources to find these traitors and hunt them like animals... So maybe they can do their fucking jobs

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's actually a serious offense to use law enforcement information systems for personal reasons. Dispatchers and emergency call takers would get fired for it. Police, maybe desk duty and a reprimand or something. Still, it is considered serious.

Source: used to be a dispatcher and 911 calltaker.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago

It used to be a serious offense to stage a coup.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 week ago

I wonder how many might have voted for him.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Protecting his Brownshirts.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago

Ensuring their loyal jackbooted thuggery to support his tyranny.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

when you fail to juggle police state with fascist right wing voters. maybe take some lessons from Erdoğan, he seems to be handling that greatly.