dont feed the trolls people, its that simple, they want you to interact with them, they need you to interact with them.
this post was submitted on 21 Jan 2025
229 points (97.9% liked)
196
1814 readers
3217 users here now
Community Rules
You must post before you leave
Be nice. Assume others have good intent (within reason).
Block or ignore posts, comments, and users that irritate you in some way rather than engaging. Report if they are actually breaking community rules.
Use content warnings and/or mark as NSFW when appropriate. Most posts with content warnings likely need to be marked NSFW.
Most 196 posts are memes, shitposts, cute images, or even just recent things that happened, etc. There is no real theme, but try to avoid posts that are very inflammatory, offensive, very low quality, or very "off topic".
Bigotry is not allowed, this includes (but is not limited to): Homophobia, Transphobia, Racism, Sexism, Abelism, Classism, or discrimination based on things like Ethnicity, Nationality, Language, or Religion.
Avoid shilling for corporations, posting advertisements, or promoting exploitation of workers.
Proselytization, support, or defense of authoritarianism is not welcome. This includes but is not limited to: imperialism, nationalism, genocide denial, ethnic or racial supremacy, fascism, Nazism, Marxism-Leninism, Maoism, etc.
Avoid AI generated content.
Avoid misinformation.
Avoid incomprehensible posts.
No threats or personal attacks.
No spam.
Moderator Guidelines
Moderator Guidelines
- Don’t be mean to users. Be gentle or neutral.
- Most moderator actions which have a modlog message should include your username.
- When in doubt about whether or not a user is problematic, send them a DM.
- Don’t waste time debating/arguing with problematic users.
- Assume the best, but don’t tolerate sealioning/just asking questions/concern trolling.
- Ask another mod to take over cases you struggle with, if you get tired, or when things get personal.
- Ask the other mods for advice when things get complicated.
- Share everything you do in the mod matrix, both so several mods aren't unknowingly handling the same issues, but also so you can receive feedback on what you intend to do.
- Don't rush mod actions. If a case doesn't need to be handled right away, consider taking a short break before getting to it. This is to say, cool down and make room for feedback.
- Don’t perform too much moderation in the comments, except if you want a verdict to be public or to ask people to dial a convo down/stop. Single comment warnings are okay.
- Send users concise DMs about verdicts about them, such as bans etc, except in cases where it is clear we don’t want them at all, such as obvious transphobes. No need to notify someone they haven’t been banned of course.
- Explain to a user why their behavior is problematic and how it is distressing others rather than engage with whatever they are saying. Ask them to avoid this in the future and send them packing if they do not comply.
- First warn users, then temp ban them, then finally perma ban them when they break the rules or act inappropriately. Skip steps if necessary.
- Use neutral statements like “this statement can be considered transphobic” rather than “you are being transphobic”.
- No large decisions or actions without community input (polls or meta posts f.ex.).
- Large internal decisions (such as ousting a mod) might require a vote, needing more than 50% of the votes to pass. Also consider asking the community for feedback.
- Remember you are a voluntary moderator. You don’t get paid. Take a break when you need one. Perhaps ask another moderator to step in if necessary.
founded 1 week ago
MODERATORS
This is evidenced by anything that turns into a right wing echo chamber where all the liberals and leftists have bailed... Eventually all the right wingers get bored and to places like Bluesky because they don't actually have anyone to troll and harass anymore.
kid named downvotes are disabled in my instance for some fuckign reason:
yeah sorry 😅 you gotta block and ignore extra hard then
The entire point of blahaj is to protect queers, especially trans. If you see it as over protective that's totally fair, and feel free to find a different instance! It's part of why Lemmy is great :)
didnt ask but thanks! i know how fedi instances work
Rude
if wanted to be mansplained about a platform i've been involved with for 8 years now i would be on lemmy.world sorry
It's well known why downvotes are disabled. From your comment it looked like you didn't know. It's reasonable to comment how it works in that situation imo.
Edit: Trying to be more polite
mh yeah my bad, didn't mean to sound so abrasive.
you're right i didn't know the reason (or rather, i remember the reason a long time ago being something along the lines of "we disabled downvotes to improve conversation", so that may be a memory issue on my part). i would have interpreted the first reply more charitably if it weren't for the "blahaj is to protect queers, feel free to move instances :)" as if i wasn't a transfem who's been on fedi (and other sites) for a while now and seen her fair share of shit thrown at her.
That makes sense.
because downvotes were used on reddit to suppress trans voices
that makes sense
That's how it's done. Don't interact, block them, move on with your day
And report them if the content is against the rules
You mean if they don't post before they leave?
hi spujb. was reminded of this one the hard way yesterday :(
hi kate. yeah :( it comes at you quicker and less obvious than you might think sometimes. but we live and learn from experience :3
as an instance admin i can see who has voted on anything which i think makes it easier sometimes to tell who’s arguing in bad faith but yk you can’t see that until you’ve already written a comment ;-)
I think it depends on the type of "troll" tbh. The traditional kind, looking to get a rise out of people for amusement? Sure, they need you to interact, and starving them of that attention kills the point. But nowadays we also use that term for people trying to shape public discourse in a dishonest fashion, such as when governments attempt to manipulate foreign public opinion, or politically motivated people pretend to be a different position in order to discredit it.
These kinds are slightly different I think, because their goal isnt necessarily to get a rise out of people, just getting seen enough times is enough to normalize their message in people's heads.
For that kind, it might be a good idea to present a counter-narrative, so that people that come across them dont subconsciously get the idea that the troll's message is one with wide public support. You wont change their mind by arguing with them of course, but that just means that the point is not to change their mind, but to drown them out essentially.
Ehhhh, nope tbh. Disengage, downvote, report for all trolls. You have the right instinct but here’s why:
their goal isnt necessarily to get a rise out of people, just getting seen enough times is enough
Correct. And responding to trolls who have this need increases views by making the thread longer, by bumping up the thread in some sorting algorithms, and by generating meta-commentary in different posts or communities. Responding to trolls gets them seen.
If you can absolutely handle not letting it become an argument, straightforward “fact check” comments that keep it short and sweet can be effective. But if you truly suspect a troll, paragraphs of lengthy response will often encourage responses and draw other trolls like a magnet.
Keep it simple. Handle with care. Block if you can’t trust yourself to keep it in hand.
The trouble is, these sorts of trolls will take no issue with simply replying to themselves on multiple accounts, gaming engagement algorithms by buying popular accounts or stealing popular content, etc. Theyre almost certainly going to get the visibility they want either way, if they know what they're doing.
Hence I think that it is important to visibly show dissent against them, especially if you get enough people in a community to do it as to leave them visibly in the minority (okay, moderation would be even better, but the viability of that depends a lot on the space), to combat the effect wherein people go along with views that they perceive as being typical of those around them. Such a thing isnt truly an argument, at least not a good faith one.
I get where you're coming from, im just not really convinced that it works as well as the conventional wisdom about trolls suggests.
Visibly show dissent simply and precisely, and I agree. If you show dissent and a chain of comments follows, you have failed.
Just wanting to be very specific here because I know many have the instinct to respond with stinging satire and commitment to defending the right thing. That’s a natural reaction! But it is textbook troll feeding and will always make things worse.
Nah, you just reply with the clown emoji and move on.