this post was submitted on 22 Jan 2025
34 points (100.0% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5719 readers
536 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Is it? Bush withdraw from Kyoto protocol, Trump already withdrew from PA. This game just became a predictable cycle, a bit like El Niño, the rest of the world got used to the unreliability of bipolar USA, which reduces their negotiating strength. Meanwhile regarding ambition for future emissions, what matters most for the next set of targets at COP30 is China and India (the former at peak due over-construction, and higher per-capita than Europe, the latter relatively low, but set to rise fast if there is no change of direction). We can wait out USA (but please sort out your bipolar system) - 4 years is not long in climate.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

We are at 1.5C, we are at the find out stage and the climate can change a lot in 4 years

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Sure it will, there's a lot of inertia and feedbacks in the system, some kicking in recently although there's nothing physically special about 1.5^o^C. Also, as well as CO~2~, emissions of CH~4~ rise fast, while those of SO~x~ fall. My point is rather that people (especially anglophones) tend to over-estimate the importance of USA in world affairs. What matters is that the rest of the world gets on with transitions.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Four years is not very long in a climate poised to undergo a phase transition unless we are able to reverse course very sharply. The IPCC is clear on this.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago

"Opinion". Yeah, to be honest I'm kind of over reading opinions.