this post was submitted on 03 Feb 2025
215 points (98.6% liked)

politics

19675 readers
4511 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The top-level post uses a gift link with a view count limit. When it runs out, an archived copy of the article is available. I'll note that the article has been substantially expanded since initial publication, and the archived copy captures the expanded version, and not the as-initially-published version.

To summarize, what's going on is that while many nominations only require 50 votes to end debate, diplomatic posts have generally relied on unanimous consent to end debate, and Senator Brian Schatz has announced that he will not be agreeing to unanimous consent on any of them, forcing a day or two debate in order to get them confirmed. Since the US has an ambassador to almost every country in the world, debating them all means spending a year or so doing ambassadorial confirmations, which is completely impractical, and unlikely to actually happen.

top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 61 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (5 children)

Isn’t that the bare minimum anyone in government should be doing right now?

[–] [email protected] 34 points 20 hours ago

It is, but this is the first of the Democratic Senators to actually start doing it, probably in response to constituent pressure.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 20 hours ago

The filibuster only comes up when it's a reason why 50 D senators and a House majority wasn't enough for Biden to do anything...

Now that it's one of the last lines of defense against fascism Schumer would prefer everyone forget it exists

[–] [email protected] 3 points 14 hours ago

Should be but they keep voting Republican initiatives in and vote to confirm absolutely dogshit and fascist candidate in.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 19 hours ago

Yes. The real thing to watch for is which Dem gets the job of disavowing this guy for being divisive and unrealistic.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 17 hours ago

No, it's even less than that.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Is this the only 1 with a spine?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 15 hours ago

A lot of them are developing a bit of one, he was just the first to respond like this to constituent pressure.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 20 hours ago

He better. And if Trump gives in, he better not stop, and just keep making more demand. We gotta learn from Republicans, this isn't a game, win then throw a fit and demand more.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 18 hours ago

Thank fuck one of these pussies finally does something a Republican would have been doing from the get go.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

https://5calls.org/

Call your representatives and tell them to push back! I know many won't listen, but don't let that stop you.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (3 children)

If it's like mine, their main DC phone numbers is perpetually saturated, and the voicemail is full. You need to be looking up district offices and calling those, or better yet, showing up in-person with a bunch of other people

Edit: Per Senator Markey, there are now technical problems with the Senate phone system:

We are aware that phones are experiencing technical issues across the U.S. Senate system. Please bear with us as we work to quickly address the issue and get our phones back online.

Makes showing up in-person at district offices incredibly important.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 18 hours ago

Show up in person and explain exactly what you want to see from them, and why it would benefit them. Then let them talk to the next person, who does the same. Make sure your representatives hear the same message again, and again, until it's easier for them to do what you're asking than not.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Hmm Musks people have been in all of the governments systems since last, and the phone don't woke now?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

At this point, I don't know that it's Musk, vs just an extraordinary volume of constituents calling in and overwhelming things.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

Hopefully it's just call volume

[–] [email protected] 2 points 18 hours ago

their main DC phone numbers is perpetually saturated

5calls.org will list the local regional office numbers as well. Agreed that if you can show up in person, that's best.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 14 hours ago

Let him know we want more of this! You should support this man NOW!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)

This is the thing? The CIA front getting defunded? Not any of the other thousand things? OK.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (1 children)

There's an avian flu epidemic forcing the culling of birds. Should we save the CDC/USDA/FDA? Nah, silence from the democratic party.

There have been terrible airplane accidents. Should we get more staff for ATC and make sure the FAA has a director in a time of crisis? Nah, silence

Should we allow anti-intellectuals and political agents police the language of science? Should we stop them from purging completed projects and scholarly papers? Nah, silence

Should we do something about a madman firing 12 inspector generals without following process? Nah, silence

Anything to protect career civil servants, keeping our government running and providing services to the people? Nah, silence.

But the CIA front is where we draw the line.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 hours ago

they are paid not to care.