this post was submitted on 06 Feb 2025
418 points (98.2% liked)

politics

19776 readers
4551 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

During a House Oversight Committee hearing, Rep. Nancy Mace (R-SC) repeatedly shouted an anti-trans slur despite objections from Democratic Rep. Gerald Connolly.

She defended her remarks by attacking transgender rights and dismissing criticism.

The outburst drew condemnation from LGBTQ+ advocates and political figures, highlighting her shift from previously supporting LGBTQ+ rights to embracing anti-trans rhetoric.

Mace has used the slur in past statements and introduced legislation restricting transgender rights.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 minutes ago

What a cissy.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 26 minutes ago

Against rando MAGAts, sure, but against the government? It's going to take more than commercial-grade weaponry to take on the military.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 27 minutes ago

These people are supposed to be representing their constituents; it isn't supposed to be an episode of Jerry Springer. I'm surprised they aren't literally throwing chairs.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 56 minutes ago

This seems a bit obsessive and more than a little unhinged. I had the unique experience of being interviewed in a state committee and the experience can be overwhelming. The idea that someone would act up this way feels performative, dramatic, and to repeat the word, obsessed.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 hour ago

That's rich, coming from a sandwich-maker that left the kitchen.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

I actually read the article and clicked on the link to the hearing back and forth and can't find what the anti trans slur was. Honestly I can't think of what an anti trans slur would be so I guess its possible I somehow missed it but I assumed it would be obvious.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Saying "tranny" is a slur.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 hours ago

ok yeah. I would have picked up on that I think. I did not see it. I mean I get they don't want to say the slur but having to rely on someones basically opinion on what is what is sorta difficult nowadays.

[–] [email protected] 68 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

T**nny today

F**got tomorrow

N****r next week

This is escalation to test the waters

[–] [email protected] 36 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

They are not testing the waters, there isn't a plan. They are just bigots doing hateful things

You are right in that there may be escalation because sooner than later these assholes will realize Trans people are so few as to be invisible to them, they'll once again see their own lives are pitiful and move onto hate someone else just to feel good about themselves for a hot minute

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

They are not testing the waters, there isn't a plan.

This is the plan

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_2025

[–] [email protected] 1 points 23 minutes ago

Where does it say they'll strategically start saying certain slurs in public in there?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago

Just because someone is a bigot doesn't mean they aren't following a plan. Testing the waters and normalizing bigoted thinking are things bigots do on purpose.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 hours ago

God this bitch is so desperate to cling to her 15 minutes of fame.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 7 hours ago

The MAGA Cult holy grail is when they can keep their careers intact after shouting the N-word in the capitol and say that they don't care.

They're almost there. Keep sleeping, murica

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

Honestly, I didn't know that was a derogatory word, because I hear it used by people within the lgbqt community. Maybe it's like the n-word where only certain people can get away with saying it?

EG, there was a famous SF club with that word in its name https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trannyshack

[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 hours ago

And most people would just go "hey man, that word is deragatory" and you'd probably go "oh sorry," and everyone moves on and grows.

But Mace was told directly "hey that's a derogatory term" and then proceeded to spew it repeatedly, because she's a cunt.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 hours ago

It's very much a "reclaimed word" in the same way the n-word is. Totally cool if one of my queer friends says it, not cool if some rando on the street shouts it at me.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 hours ago

I read this article just to learn what slur was used, but they only lost it as t*****. I'm just going to assume the hurtful slur is trumpy.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 8 hours ago

The actual stripping of protections, the laws they are or will pass, those are bad enough already, but sometimes it feels like the worst part is just how brave these bigot shitfuckers have become now that their pet nazi is in power. They don't even have the decency to be afraid to fly their hate flag anymore. They were always shitty people, but at least they used to feel like the country at large would reject them for expressing their true feelings, hence all the pushback against "Cancel Culture." Now, though, they're not even afraid of ostriziation, much less anything more substantial.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 hours ago

Hey man if I lived in the USA I would probably start planning something incredibly violent as a response

load more comments
view more: next ›