this post was submitted on 06 Feb 2025
616 points (99.0% liked)

politics

19830 readers
5374 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Trump evicted former Coast Guard Commandant Linda Fagan from her military housing with just three hours' notice, despite an earlier 60-day waiver.

Fagan, the first woman to lead a military branch, was dismissed on Trump's second day in office over concerns about DEI policies and border security.

Homeland Security officials cited her termination as justification, though sources called it a "petty" move.

Fagan was forced to leave most belongings behind, spending the night with friends while awaiting relocation of her personal items.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 91 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

the sheer amount of my taxpayer dollars that will go into lawsuit settlements over the next 20 years is infuriating

[–] [email protected] 12 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Why do you think any lawsuits for any of these things would actually get anywhere at this point?

[–] [email protected] 20 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

The repercussions of this administration will be going on for decades

[–] [email protected] 10 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Right but you seem to be inferring that the totalitarianism sweeping the nation at the moment will just go away or something, and lawsuits on things like this will actually be a thing in, say, 10 years.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 hours ago

yeah this is just the start. it's gonna get progressively worse until inevitably the system blows up. that could take decades. i'm guessing it culminates in some sort of unwinnable war

[–] [email protected] 9 points 15 hours ago

New tax on billion dollar entities or higher scaling exponentially for every additional zero , make them pay it. Government should spend money, on the people for the people and by the people

[–] [email protected] 115 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

Getting fired because you're a woman, with reasoning that seems to boil down to "we don't think a woman can do this job," sounds like a pretty good case for a wrongful, discriminatory firing suit.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 hours ago

They just put an asshole in charge of the EEOC who doesn’t believe this is discrimination. Who would enforce a judgement even if they won?

[–] [email protected] 37 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

4/9 of the supreme court are women. When are they going to go?

[–] [email protected] 20 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

At least 1 black guy to my knowledge too

[–] [email protected] 28 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

We don't count that Uncle Tom mother fucker

[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 hours ago

Fascists will still count him if his knee doesn't bend enough.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 18 hours ago

You guys need to remember the real constitution that our oligarchy follows "Rules for thee, not for me"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

Serving a violent, racist, patriarchical empire isn't all that it's cracked up to be.

[–] [email protected] 69 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Is he literally saying "Girls can't do that job, that's a job for a man"?

[–] [email protected] 32 points 21 hours ago
[–] [email protected] 14 points 19 hours ago

No no no it's clearly DEI

[–] [email protected] 31 points 23 hours ago

over concerns

No.

[–] [email protected] 55 points 1 day ago (4 children)

The left needs to learn how to "Speak softly and carry a big stick."

Speaking softly alone gets you fucking nowhere. This is why the far right gains so much ground. They know the DNC and the apparatus of the left is toothless. All they do is browbeat.

Get.some.fucking.teeth.

If the DNC cannot bite back, it needs to die or else ethnic cleansing and genocide is inevitable in this country.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 hours ago

I want to start a new political party in alabama based solely on making the average workers life a little bit better.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 20 hours ago

The little person, too, needs to learn to just say no. Make them push it farther. Fight back and get pyrrhic victories.

I'm guessing this was on a military base, so the usual eviction shit doesn't apply, but remember that in civilian life, until law enforcement shows up with a court order in hand, anyone removing you from your house is breaking criminal law.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 169 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (10 children)

I guess her crime was to try to employ more people who weren't cishet white men. Unforgivable to the fascists in charge. And anyway, they just get off on cruelty because it distracts them from the emptiness inside.

[–] [email protected] 119 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Given their recent demand that NASA remove information about "women in leadership", it paints a pretty clear picture of why she was fired. Nothing to do with capability, competence, or any issues with her command.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 hours ago

It’s almost like Hegseth was lying when he said he respected women in the military.

[–] [email protected] 156 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

Margaret fucking Hamilton, got us to the moon.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 49 minutes ago

Your name is correct

[–] [email protected] 70 points 1 day ago (1 children)

For those not in the know:

Here, Margaret is shown standing beside listings of the software developed by her and the team she was in charge of, the LM [lunar module] and CM [command module] on-board flight software team.

https://science.nasa.gov/people/margaret-hamilton/

[–] [email protected] 13 points 21 hours ago

For those confused and thinking that the Wicked Witch of the West was somehow aging backwards after faking her death and escaping from Oz:

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] [email protected] 92 points 1 day ago

They’re bullies. They get off on acting like this.

[–] [email protected] 34 points 1 day ago

almost there

load more comments
view more: next ›