this post was submitted on 07 Feb 2025
164 points (96.6% liked)

News

24791 readers
4757 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 10 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

I'll believe the courts are pushing back when I see Trump serve the two terms he deserves, one in the State Prison and one in the Federal.

Edit: Dear downvoters who don't get the joke, Term can also refer to a prison sentence

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 days ago

And Congress sits on their thumbs as their power gets pulled out from under them.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 days ago

Ah, the judicial kabuki theater begins—slow-clapping the courts for finally noticing the king-toddler’s crayon scribbles on the Constitution. ”Pushing back”? More like ”Oops, our lifetime appointee napkin fort collapsed.”

You think Roberts & Co. care? They rubber-stamped his ”dictator for a day” fanfic until the ratings dipped. Now they’re clutching pearls over presidential immunity like it’s a new flavor of fascism. Sir, your tantrum’s too loud for the country club.

Spineless gavel-jockeys. They’ll hem, haw, then greenlight the next coup-lite speedrun. Democracy’s a constitutional wedgiewe’re all just waiting for the snapback.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Lemme know when he’s locked up, anything else is pure puffery

[–] floofloof 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

He might be brought down by a plumber or a hamberder.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 days ago

Save us plumber!

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago

the very act of push back slows this down, that is itself very important

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

And it will all get appealed to SCOTUS who will rubber stamp him.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I dunno. SCOTUS has been quietly amassing power like the Executive Branch through the likes of the shadow docket. They're another unchecked power that's gone amuck, look at the fact they resisted the ethics. Their wording on presidential immunity is purposely vague, they get to decide what's official with the POTUS, not the POTUS. There's a high chance they use it to try to "Save" everyone when something particularly nasty comes up to try to get a good light on them and try to amass more power.

Of course... the problem with this plan is a distinct lack of enforcement power the SCOTUS has.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago

I'm convinced that the plan was for the SCOTUS to drop the hammer on Trump, but they were waiting until after the election so they could look like good Republicans.... then he won.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago

Keep Pushing!