this post was submitted on 12 Feb 2025
382 points (99.5% liked)

196

2092 readers
1889 users here now

Community Rules

You must post before you leave

Be nice. Assume others have good intent (within reason).

Block or ignore posts, comments, and users that irritate you in some way rather than engaging. Report if they are actually breaking community rules.

Use content warnings and/or mark as NSFW when appropriate. Most posts with content warnings likely need to be marked NSFW.

Most 196 posts are memes, shitposts, cute images, or even just recent things that happened, etc. There is no real theme, but try to avoid posts that are very inflammatory, offensive, very low quality, or very "off topic".

Bigotry is not allowed, this includes (but is not limited to): Homophobia, Transphobia, Racism, Sexism, Abelism, Classism, or discrimination based on things like Ethnicity, Nationality, Language, or Religion.

Avoid shilling for corporations, posting advertisements, or promoting exploitation of workers.

Proselytization, support, or defense of authoritarianism is not welcome. This includes but is not limited to: imperialism, nationalism, genocide denial, ethnic or racial supremacy, fascism, Nazism, Marxism-Leninism, Maoism, etc.

Avoid AI generated content.

Avoid misinformation.

Avoid incomprehensible posts.

No threats or personal attacks.

No spam.

Moderator Guidelines

Moderator Guidelines

  • Don’t be mean to users. Be gentle or neutral.
  • Most moderator actions which have a modlog message should include your username.
  • When in doubt about whether or not a user is problematic, send them a DM.
  • Don’t waste time debating/arguing with problematic users.
  • Assume the best, but don’t tolerate sealioning/just asking questions/concern trolling.
  • Ask another mod to take over cases you struggle with, if you get tired, or when things get personal.
  • Ask the other mods for advice when things get complicated.
  • Share everything you do in the mod matrix, both so several mods aren't unknowingly handling the same issues, but also so you can receive feedback on what you intend to do.
  • Don't rush mod actions. If a case doesn't need to be handled right away, consider taking a short break before getting to it. This is to say, cool down and make room for feedback.
  • Don’t perform too much moderation in the comments, except if you want a verdict to be public or to ask people to dial a convo down/stop. Single comment warnings are okay.
  • Send users concise DMs about verdicts about them, such as bans etc, except in cases where it is clear we don’t want them at all, such as obvious transphobes. No need to notify someone they haven’t been banned of course.
  • Explain to a user why their behavior is problematic and how it is distressing others rather than engage with whatever they are saying. Ask them to avoid this in the future and send them packing if they do not comply.
  • First warn users, then temp ban them, then finally perma ban them when they break the rules or act inappropriately. Skip steps if necessary.
  • Use neutral statements like “this statement can be considered transphobic” rather than “you are being transphobic”.
  • No large decisions or actions without community input (polls or meta posts f.ex.).
  • Large internal decisions (such as ousting a mod) might require a vote, needing more than 50% of the votes to pass. Also consider asking the community for feedback.
  • Remember you are a voluntary moderator. You don’t get paid. Take a break when you need one. Perhaps ask another moderator to step in if necessary.

founded 3 weeks ago
MODERATORS
 
all 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 day ago

You can't just post XKCD without the title text.

https://xkcd.com/1520/

Title text: I'M SORRY, FROM YOUR YEARS OF CONDESCENDING TOWARD THE 'SQUISHY SCIENCES', I ASSUMED YOU'D BE A LITTLE HARDER.

[–] [email protected] 96 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Chemistry: "So anyways, here's Zyklon B"

[–] [email protected] 77 points 2 days ago (1 children)

In chemistry they flip a coin to decide if their next product will improves mankinds quality of life tenfold or be the reason the Geneva convention needs a rewriting

[–] [email protected] 45 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)
[–] Nomecks 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Also Chemists: Here's some plutonium

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

I mean it is an effective pestizide and when used for its intended purpose it seems to have been rather safe and effective 😅 I doubt they planned for it's miss use when they developed it in the 1920s

[–] [email protected] 76 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Title text: I'M SORRY, FROM YOUR YEARS OF CONDESCENDING TOWARD THE 'SQUISHY SCIENCES', I ASSUMED YOU'D BE A LITTLE HARDER.

As a former social sciences and history student, I sure wish people would actually want to use those fields' results. Without trying to make things worse instead of better.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 days ago

Chem didn't even get to speak. Fitting.

[–] [email protected] 50 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I appreciate that Randall Munroe isn't a part of the Feynman cult. Angela Collier did a great video about it a few months ago.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 2 days ago

I came here to post this video, because it's really great. For anyone who cares to separate the myth from the reality: it's worth your time. She's honest, and realistic, without being mean or hyperbolic. (Ok, but maybe a liiiiittle sarcasm, as a treat!)

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Uh-oh. As a shallow level science lover I've always liked and respected Feynman and how he has presented science to layfolk like myself. I'm expecting some disappointing information when I dig into this video tomorrow.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago

From watching the video, he's a great and talented science communicator and a decent man (depending on if the divorce trial was mutually fabricated or real).

But he's a mid scientist that doesn't really deserve to have his work compared to Einstein and Newton like he often is.

He also made up a bunch of macho cool stories about himself that's like Rick Sanchez mixed with an "Alpha Male", and much like both it infected young guys for years to come.

Also bongos.

[–] [email protected] 44 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Chem just sitting there fucking sweating

Edit: also biologist cant talk considering nazi experiments and unit 731

[–] [email protected] 23 points 2 days ago (1 children)

No, because those are not treated like heroes in their disciplines.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 days ago

Oh true fair point

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

Didn’t biologists help develop biological weapons? I don’t know if I’d hold this against physics. Science has been used for evil in all fields: physicists just discovered the world ending weapon first.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

Now I’m not here to talk about Judy. In fact, we’re not going to talk about Judy at all.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Why Chem don't get to participate?

[–] [email protected] 36 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] ininewcrow 20 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Bio was also later disqualified because of WWIII .... or was it WWIV? or WWV? ... I forget but it was one of them anyway.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 days ago

Hey, spoilers

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago

The point of the comic was made, and going on would just drag out the joke.

The comic could equally be made with the chemists fighting famine.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 days ago

I love Bio, she's so cute, especially when she talks about the horrors of the other fields