this post was submitted on 15 Feb 2025
286 points (99.0% liked)

politics

20366 readers
3863 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

The Trump administration, led by Elon Musk, has escalated its mass firing of federal workers, dismissing thousands across multiple agencies.

Union leaders condemn the purge as a politically motivated power grab rather than a cost-saving measure.

Many workers received no notice or due process, while chaotic termination notices deepened confusion.

Critics link the firings to Project 2025’s goal of dismantling government oversight, warning it will lead to corruption and benefit the wealthy.

top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 days ago

It's about undermining all of us poors influence and unchecked power so we can be billionaire's slaves

[–] [email protected] 57 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Never was...

This is a coup...

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

A very stupid but somewhat effective coup

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Somewhat effective? How much more effective you want it to be?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

I don't want this time line at all

[–] [email protected] 45 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Trump ballooned the Federal debt by $8 trillion in his last term.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Those were rookie numbers. This time round he's gonna destroy the credit rating, bankrupt the state, and sell off the whole country to corporations, piece by piece.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (2 children)

A) yes I believe you say truth B) how would trump make money by destroying the credit rankings? Don’t rich bank people make money when they can effectively evaluate risks?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Borrow a lot and default, a quick way to get cash and torch your credit rating. Trump and his billionaire friends will do everything they can to suck the marrow out of America and leave it empty. Bankers' credit models can account for political risk, but that's more tailored to countries like Argentina, not the world's largest economy. We're in new territory.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 days ago

So basically just how Trump ran his casinos into the ground? Get all the money he can from the government and declare bankruptcy to not have to pay the bill. gReAt BuSsInEsSmAn!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

If you know how markets will react ahead of time, you can make money. Additionally:

  1. Take out massive loans and build/buy physical assets ASAP
  2. Destroy economy by removing bank regulations, federal insurance on banks, let America default on loans
  3. Bank goes defunct and can't collect loan from you
  4. ???
  5. Profit
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Right wing economics thinks that the free market solves everything, and that government just gets in the way and prevents the market from solving everything. That's why they want to dismantle the government, they think it will lead to glorious prosperity. You can see this when Musk says the future it's going to be amazing and various other things like that from many people. Now there are a lot of other things going on, but that's basically the origin. To them if it makes profit, then it is good in every sense by definition. And they think if it doesn't make profit, then it is bad in every sense, again by definition. The more profit it makes, the more good it is.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

And never mind those pesky externalities; those are for the poors to suffer.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

To them you're only poor if you didn't pull yourself up by your bootstraps, again because profit good by definition. If you are poor, then you are bad by definition.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Of course it's not. If it was, "DOGE" would include the enormous defense budget in its targets. They're only targeting comparatively small social programs, because they're ideologically driven not "efficiency" driven