this post was submitted on 15 Feb 2025
716 points (92.3% liked)

News

25189 readers
4729 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

TL;DR: The CyberTruck is 17 times more likely to have a fire fatality than a Ford Pinto

(page 2) 33 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago

but how does it compare to tanks in the "deaths from fire per vehicle sold" test?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago (3 children)

What about the Crown Victoria?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] -3 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (4 children)

this again? They didn't even read their own reference for the fire stats...

With its decade-long production run, the NHTSA reported that the Ford Pinto and its famously flawed gas tank behind the rear bumper caused 27 fiery deaths with its knowingly negligent design. https://www.autosafety.org/wp-content/uploads/import/ODIPinto.pdf

Cherrypicking galore:

  1. They literally took 27 which is the fire deaths from rear-ending only (vs 41 fire fatalities from a 2.5 year period instead of the 9 years they mention
  2. They conveniently did not use the 1,626 pinto fatalities from those 2.5 years.
  3. They used the total number of pintos produced, not the number of pintos on the roads at the end of the analysis, which would be less than 2.2M.

At least they did get your clicks.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

There was the original story a week ago about this and the "analyst" included the fireworks explosion in Vegas to get to their resiult.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

yup. it's quite disturbing that even a rolling industrial garbage container like the CT needs fake analyses to be ridiculed.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

I don't really want to get into a debate about specifics, but this has long been the case with Elon and Tesla/SpaceX.

Especially pre pedo comment, much of what gets said about him and his companies are much like including the fireworks. Fake, made up, or exaggerated shit meant to stir up extra hate for the circle jerk.

However, he has done so many blatantly bad things since then that there really is no reason to have to make shit up or do fake analysis, but it still happens and always has. The circlejerk needs to continue fake or not.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Facts getting in a way of hating on things we don't like????

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago

Yeah, facts aren't very popular when it's about shitting on the cybertruck.:D

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›